From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754045AbbBLAH6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:07:58 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:57270 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752127AbbBLAH5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:07:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 01:07:55 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: pali.rohar@gmail.com, sre@debian.org, sre@ring0.de, kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, khilman@kernel.org, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com, patrikbachan@gmail.com Subject: Re: -n900 (not mainline): fix compilation with 3.20-rc0 Message-ID: <20150212000755.GA27058@amd> References: <20150211222342.GE11313@amd> <54DBD8C3.4090904@cogentembedded.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54DBD8C3.4090904@cogentembedded.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 2015-02-12 01:33:39, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 02/12/2015 01:23 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > This looked like a patch in its final form, so I decided to > comment on it... Yeah, well, (not mainline) in the subject should have told you that there's no need to nitpick on this, sorry. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 01:07:55 +0100 Subject: -n900 (not mainline): fix compilation with 3.20-rc0 In-Reply-To: <54DBD8C3.4090904@cogentembedded.com> References: <20150211222342.GE11313@amd> <54DBD8C3.4090904@cogentembedded.com> Message-ID: <20150212000755.GA27058@amd> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu 2015-02-12 01:33:39, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 02/12/2015 01:23 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > This looked like a patch in its final form, so I decided to > comment on it... Yeah, well, (not mainline) in the subject should have told you that there's no need to nitpick on this, sorry. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html