From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, sbsiddha@gmail.com,
luto@amacapital.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86,fpu: remove redundant increments of fpu_counter
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:54:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150218235435.GB3363@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150218234003.GB7880@gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:40:03AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Is there consensus on the first 5 patches?
I've picked up that series here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1423252925-14451-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com
Maybe I should reply when picking up stuff so that we don't overlap.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-18 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-23 19:34 question about save_xstate_sig() - WHY DOES THIS WORK? Rik van Riel
2015-01-23 20:51 ` [PATCH, RFC] x86,fpu: make signal handling xstate save & restore preemption safe Rik van Riel
2015-01-23 21:07 ` question about save_xstate_sig() - WHY DOES THIS WORK? H. Peter Anvin
2015-01-24 13:39 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-24 20:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-26 23:27 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-27 19:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-27 20:27 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-27 20:50 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 20:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 20:52 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:00 ` [PATCH RFC] x86,fpu: merge save_init_fpu & unlazy_fpu Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:07 ` [PATCH 0/3]: x86, fpu: unlazy_fpu fixes/cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, fpu: unlazy_fpu: don't reset thread.fpu_counter Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:26 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, fpu: unlazy_fpu: don't do __thread_fpu_end() if use_eager_fpu() Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:36 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:53 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:54 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, fpu: kill save_init_fpu(), change math_error() to use unlazy_fpu() Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:54 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 0/3]: x86, fpu: unlazy_fpu fixes/cleanups Dave Hansen
2015-01-29 21:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:43 ` Dave Hansen
2015-01-29 21:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-29 21:58 ` Rik van Riel
2015-01-29 23:26 ` Dave Hansen
2015-01-30 1:33 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-02 18:11 ` Dave Hansen
2015-01-30 12:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-30 13:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-30 13:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] cleanups to the disable lazy fpu restore code riel
2015-01-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86,fpu: move lazy restore functions up a few lines riel
2015-01-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86,fpu: introduce task_disable_lazy_fpu_restore helper riel
2015-01-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86,fpu: use disable_task_lazy_fpu_restore helper riel
2015-01-30 21:46 ` Dave Hansen
2015-01-30 21:48 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-02 17:56 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-02 18:00 ` [PATCH 0/6] cleanups to lazy FPU restore code riel
2015-02-02 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86,fpu: move lazy restore functions up a few lines riel
2015-02-02 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86,fpu: introduce task_disable_lazy_fpu_restore helper riel
2015-02-02 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86,fpu: use an explicit if/else in switch_fpu_prepare riel
2015-02-02 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86,fpu: use disable_task_lazy_fpu_restore helper riel
2015-02-02 19:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-02 19:43 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-03 19:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-03 22:01 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-06 16:42 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-02 18:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86,fpu: also check fpu_lazy_restore when use_eager_fpu riel
2015-02-02 18:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-02 19:19 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-02 18:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86,fpu: remove redundant increments of fpu_counter riel
2015-02-02 18:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-02 18:40 ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-18 23:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-18 23:54 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-02-19 20:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150218235435.GB3363@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sbsiddha@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.