diff for duplicates of <20150220080448.GL32600@odux.rfo.atmel.com>
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index d574c4c..b9dbf22 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -28,10 +28,10 @@ On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:30:58AM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >>>> the FW/bootloader could be common even if the DTB couldn't.
> >>>>
> >>>> To some extent there must be a DTB that will work across all variants
-> >>>> (albeit with limited utility) or the quirk approach wouldn't work…
+> >>>> (albeit with limited utility) or the quirk approach wouldn't work?
> >>>>
> >>>
-> >>> That’s not correct; the only part of the DTB that needs to be common
+> >>> That?s not correct; the only part of the DTB that needs to be common
> >>> is the model property that would allow the quirk detection logic to fire.
> >>>
> >>> So, there is a base DTB that will work on all variants, but that only means
@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:30:58AM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >>>>>> appended DTB if it's not possible to update the board configuration.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
-> >>>>> You’re missing the point. I can’t use the same DTB for each revision of the
-> >>>>> board. Each board is similar but it’s not identical.
+> >>>>> You?re missing the point. I can?t use the same DTB for each revision of the
+> >>>>> board. Each board is similar but it?s not identical.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think you've misunderstood my point. If you program the board with the
> >>>> relevant DTB, or use appended DTB, then you will pass the correct DTB to
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:30:58AM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >>>
> >>> In theory it might work, in practice this does not. Ludovic mentioned that they
> >>> have 27 different DTBs in use at the moment. At a relatively common 60k per DTB
-> >>> that’s 27x60k = 1.6MB of DTBs, that need to be installed.
+> >>> that?s 27x60k = 1.6MB of DTBs, that need to be installed.
> >>
> >> < snip >
> >>
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:30:58AM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >
> > Trust no-one.
> >
-> > This is one of those things that the kernel community doesn’t understand which makes people
+> > This is one of those things that the kernel community doesn?t understand which makes people
> > who push product quite mad.
> >
> > Engineering a product is not only about meeting customer spec, in order to turn a profit
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 09:30:58AM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >
> > Yes, you can always manually install files in the bootloader. For 1 board no problem.
> > For 10 doable. For 100 I guess you can hire an extra guy. For 1 million? Guess what,
-> > instead of turning a profit you’re losing money if you only have a few cents of profit
+> > instead of turning a profit you?re losing money if you only have a few cents of profit
> > per unit.
>
> I'm not installing physical components manually. Why would I be installing software
@@ -121,16 +121,16 @@ don't take care about dtb stuff.
> And you produce a few million units before testing that the first one off the line works?
>
> >
-> > And frankly I don’t care what other OSes do. If you were to take a look at the sorry DT support
-> > they have you’d be amazed.
+> > And frankly I don?t care what other OSes do. If you were to take a look at the sorry DT support
+> > they have you?d be amazed.
> >
-> > I would be very surprised if there’s another OS out there that can boot with a late Linux DTB.
+> > I would be very surprised if there?s another OS out there that can boot with a late Linux DTB.
> >
> >> -Frank
> >
> > Regards
> >
-> > — Pantelis
+> > ? Pantelis
> >
> > PS. For a real use case please take a look at the answer Guenter gave on this thread a little
> > while back.
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index ab89c0b..a8ce28d 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -26,30 +26,16 @@
"ref\00054E61DD2.3060002\@gmail.com\0"
]
[
- "From\0Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches\@atmel.com>\0"
+ "From\0ludovic.desroches\@atmel.com (Ludovic Desroches)\0"
]
[
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH 2/4] of: DT quirks infrastructure\0"
]
[
"Date\0Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:04:48 +0100\0"
]
[
- "To\0Frank Rowand <frowand.list\@gmail.com>\0"
-]
-[
- "Cc\0Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou\@konsulko.com>",
- " Mark Rutland <mark.rutland\@arm.com>",
- " devicetree\@vger.kernel.org <devicetree\@vger.kernel.org>",
- " Tony Lindgren <tony\@atomide.com>",
- " Koen Kooi <koen\@dominion.thruhere.net>",
- " Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre\@atmel.com>",
- " linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org>",
- " Grant Likely <grant.likely\@secretlab.ca>",
- " Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches\@atmel.com>",
- " linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org>",
- " Matt Porter <matt.porter\@linaro.org>",
- " Guenter Roeck <linux\@roeck-us.net>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org\0"
]
[
"\0000:1\0"
@@ -88,10 +74,10 @@
"> >>>> the FW/bootloader could be common even if the DTB couldn't.\n",
"> >>>>\n",
"> >>>> To some extent there must be a DTB that will work across all variants\n",
- "> >>>> (albeit with limited utility) or the quirk approach wouldn't work\342\200\246\n",
+ "> >>>> (albeit with limited utility) or the quirk approach wouldn't work?\n",
"> >>>>\n",
"> >>>\n",
- "> >>> That\342\200\231s not correct; the only part of the DTB that needs to be common\n",
+ "> >>> That?s not correct; the only part of the DTB that needs to be common\n",
"> >>> is the model property that would allow the quirk detection logic to fire.\n",
"> >>>\n",
"> >>> So, there is a base DTB that will work on all variants, but that only means\n",
@@ -120,8 +106,8 @@
"> >>>>>> appended DTB if it's not possible to update the board configuration.\n",
"> >>>>>>\n",
"> >>>>>\n",
- "> >>>>> You\342\200\231re missing the point. I can\342\200\231t use the same DTB for each revision of the\n",
- "> >>>>> board. Each board is similar but it\342\200\231s not identical.\n",
+ "> >>>>> You?re missing the point. I can?t use the same DTB for each revision of the\n",
+ "> >>>>> board. Each board is similar but it?s not identical.\n",
"> >>>>\n",
"> >>>> I think you've misunderstood my point. If you program the board with the\n",
"> >>>> relevant DTB, or use appended DTB, then you will pass the correct DTB to\n",
@@ -132,7 +118,7 @@
"> >>>\n",
"> >>> In theory it might work, in practice this does not. Ludovic mentioned that they\n",
"> >>> have 27 different DTBs in use at the moment. At a relatively common 60k per DTB\n",
- "> >>> that\342\200\231s 27x60k = 1.6MB of DTBs, that need to be installed.\n",
+ "> >>> that?s 27x60k = 1.6MB of DTBs, that need to be installed.\n",
"> >>\n",
"> >> < snip >\n",
"> >>\n",
@@ -147,7 +133,7 @@
"> > \n",
"> > Trust no-one.\n",
"> > \n",
- "> > This is one of those things that the kernel community doesn\342\200\231t understand which makes people\n",
+ "> > This is one of those things that the kernel community doesn?t understand which makes people\n",
"> > who push product quite mad.\n",
"> > \n",
"> > Engineering a product is not only about meeting customer spec, in order to turn a profit\n",
@@ -155,7 +141,7 @@
"> > \n",
"> > Yes, you can always manually install files in the bootloader. For 1 board no problem.\n",
"> > For 10 doable. For 100 I guess you can hire an extra guy. For 1 million? Guess what,\n",
- "> > instead of turning a profit you\342\200\231re losing money if you only have a few cents of profit\n",
+ "> > instead of turning a profit you?re losing money if you only have a few cents of profit\n",
"> > per unit.\n",
"> \n",
"> I'm not installing physical components manually. Why would I be installing software\n",
@@ -181,16 +167,16 @@
"> And you produce a few million units before testing that the first one off the line works?\n",
"> \n",
"> > \n",
- "> > And frankly I don\342\200\231t care what other OSes do. If you were to take a look at the sorry DT support\n",
- "> > they have you\342\200\231d be amazed.\n",
+ "> > And frankly I don?t care what other OSes do. If you were to take a look at the sorry DT support\n",
+ "> > they have you?d be amazed.\n",
"> > \n",
- "> > I would be very surprised if there\342\200\231s another OS out there that can boot with a late Linux DTB.\n",
+ "> > I would be very surprised if there?s another OS out there that can boot with a late Linux DTB.\n",
"> > \n",
"> >> -Frank\n",
"> > \n",
"> > Regards\n",
"> > \n",
- "> > \342\200\224 Pantelis\n",
+ "> > ? Pantelis\n",
"> > \n",
"> > PS. For a real use case please take a look at the answer Guenter gave on this thread a little\n",
"> > while back.\n",
@@ -202,4 +188,4 @@
">"
]
-ba47d91001d1fc63f9825bda17622a8db9f09ec40fda096adfec147203525c93
+477ca2d6c0bb6514cdd9150e7b54c99a13e4a5acf595f066d73ec356b75b933d
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.