From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] net: use skb->priority for overloading skb->dropcount and skb->reserved_tailroom instead of skb->mark Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:48:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20150223.164801.842537100812023841.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1424713924-6821-2-git-send-email-eyal.birger@gmail.com> <1424713924-6821-4-git-send-email-eyal.birger@gmail.com> <20150223205633.7fbd08d4@halley> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eyal.birger@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:38045 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752158AbbBWVsE (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:48:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150223205633.7fbd08d4@halley> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Shmulik Ladkani Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:56:33 +0200 > May I suggest to unalias 'mark' out of the union? Only in exchange for finding a way to remove completely another object of the same size from sk_buff. I refuse to let it grow any more, it's already way too big.