All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Pawlowski <jpawlowski@google.com>,
	"linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BlueZ v5] doc/adapter-api.txt: StartFilteredDiscovery method.
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 15:09:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150223130923.GA28722@t440s.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABBYNZLaFta8897Xr91UQ-sUy-COviXxRP84GKTyYSUQDfDjyg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Luiz,

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > +               void StartFilteredDiscovery(dict filter)
> > +
> > +                       This method starts the device discovery session with
> > +                       filtering by uuids, and rssi or pathloss value. Use
> > +                       StopDiscovery to release the sessions acquired.
> > +
> > +                       Parameters that can be set in filter dictionary include
> > +                       the following:
> > +
> > +                       array{string} UUIDs : filtered service UUIDs (required)
> > +                       int16 RSSI      : RSSI threshold value (optional)
> > +                       uint16 pathloss : Pathloss threshold value (optional)
> > +                       string transport: type of scan to run
> > +
> > +                       When a device is found that advertise any UUID from
> > +                       UUIDs, it will be reported if:
> > +                       - pathloss and RSSI are both empty,
> > +                       - only pathloss param is set, device advertise TX pwer,
> > +                         and computed pathloss is less than pathloss param,
> > +                       - only RSSI param is set, and received RSSI is higher
> > +                         than RSSI param,
> > +
> > +                       transport parameter determines the type of scan:
> > +                               "auto"  - interleaved scan
> > +                               "bredr" - br/edr inquiry
> > +                               "le"    - le only scan, default value
> > +
> > +                       This process will start creating Device objects as new
> > +                       devices matching criteria are discovered. It will also
> > +                       emit PropertiesChanged signal for already existing
> > +                       Device objects, with updated RSSI value.
> > +
> > +                       StartDiscovery (SD) takes precedence over
> > +                       StartFilteredDiscovery (SFD). That means that you should
> > +                       check Discovering property before calling SFD, otherwise
> > +                       it would fail when any SD session is in progress.
> > +                       Calling SD when SFD is in progress pause all SFD
> > +                       sessions, and start them back when all SD sessions are
> > +                       finished. When filtered discovery state is changed,
> > +                       FilteredDiscovery variable is updated accordingly.
> > +
> > +                       Possible errors: org.bluez.Error.NotReady
> > +                                        org.bluez.Error.Failed
> > +
> >                 void StopDiscovery()
> >
> >                         This method will cancel any previous StartDiscovery
> > @@ -144,6 +188,11 @@ Properties string Address [readonly]
> >
> >                         Indicates that a device discovery procedure is active.
> >
> > +               boolean FilteredDiscovery [readonly]
> > +
> > +                       Indicates that a filtered device discovery procedure is
> > +                       active.
> > +
> >                 array{string} UUIDs [readonly]
> >
> >                         List of 128-bit UUIDs that represents the available
> > --
> > 2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c
> 
> @Marcel, Johan: Is this API okay for you? We should probably make them
> experimental to begin with.

For the most part I'm fine with this, especially if it's marked as
experimental. As for the relationship to StartDiscovery, I'd take a
similar approach as we have done with the mgmt API, i.e. StartDiscovery
would be just a special kind of filtered discovery without any filters
(i.e. reporting all devices).

For the case of multiple applications requesting different discoveries
at the same time we'd go with the common denominator approach, i.e.
applications must be prepared to see devices outside of the range of
filters that it has specified (the only way to avoid something like that
support is to do unicast D-Bus signals which in turn would break
"passive observer" applications). Calling StartDiscovery when there are
one or more service discoveries in progress would simply clear out the
filters and start reporting all devices.

Considering the above style approach, the new property seems a bit
pointless.

Since we can't any more track multiple different discoveries within the
same application (D-Bus connection) the StopDiscovery behavior is now
quite broken. The simplest way around that would be to add a discovery
instance return parameter to StartServiceDiscovery and to have a new
StopServiceDiscovery D-Bus method that'd take this as an input
parameter.

Johan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-23 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-10  0:34 [PATCH BlueZ v5] doc/adapter-api.txt: StartFilteredDiscovery method Jakub Pawlowski
2015-02-16  8:46 ` Luiz Augusto von Dentz
2015-02-20 17:09   ` Jakub Pawlowski
2015-02-23 13:09   ` Johan Hedberg [this message]
2015-02-23 16:41     ` Jakub Pawlowski
2015-02-23 18:43       ` Jakub Pawlowski
2015-02-23 21:43         ` Arman Uguray
2015-02-23 22:44           ` Jakub Pawlowski
2015-02-23 23:07             ` Arman Uguray
2015-02-24  0:01               ` Jakub Pawlowski
2015-02-24 10:51                 ` Johan Hedberg
2015-02-24 10:37       ` Johan Hedberg
2015-02-24 20:23         ` Jakub Pawlowski
2015-02-24 22:50           ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-02-24 23:12             ` Jakub Pawlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150223130923.GA28722@t440s.lan \
    --to=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=jpawlowski@google.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.