From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] rte_sched: don't clear statistics when read Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:18:52 -0800 Message-ID: <20150224111852.42253352@urahara> References: <1423116841-19799-4-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20150205124330.GB28355@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" , Stephen Hemminger To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:51:31 +0000 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-02-05 07:43, Neil Horman: > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:13:58PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > + > > > +/** > > > + * Hierarchical scheduler subport statistics reset > > > + * > > > + * @param port > > > + * Handle to port scheduler instance > > > + * @param subport_id > > > + * Subport ID > > > + * @return > > > + * 0 upon success, error code otherwise > > > + */ > > > +int > > > +rte_sched_subport_stats_reset(struct rte_sched_port *port, > > > + uint32_t subport_id); > > > + > > > /** > > > * Hierarchical scheduler queue statistics read > > > * > > > @@ -338,6 +353,20 @@ rte_sched_queue_read_stats(struct rte_sched_port *port, > > > struct rte_sched_queue_stats *stats, > > > uint16_t *qlen); > > > > > > +/** > > > + * Hierarchical scheduler queue statistics reset > > > + * > > > + * @param port > > > + * Handle to port scheduler instance > > > + * @param queue_id > > > + * Queue ID within port scheduler > > > + * @return > > > + * 0 upon success, error code otherwise > > > + */ > > > +int > > > +rte_sched_queue_stats_reset(struct rte_sched_port *port, > > > + uint32_t queue_id); > > > + > > Both need to be added to the version map to expose them properly. > > Neil > > Stephen, this patchset is partially acked and could enter in 2.0.0-rc1. > May you send a v3 addressing comments? Or should I break the serie by > applying only some of them? Or postpone the serie to 2.1? I can resend v3. Wasn't clear that a conclusion was reached. IMHO read should not clear.