From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754317AbbBZUdO (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:33:14 -0500 Received: from h2.hallyn.com ([78.46.35.8]:41785 "EHLO h2.hallyn.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754226AbbBZUdK (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:33:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:33:08 -0600 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Christoph Lameter , Serge Hallyn , Serge Hallyn , Aaron Jones , "Ted Ts'o" , LSM List , Andrew Morton , "Andrew G. Morgan" , Mimi Zohar , Austin S Hemmelgarn , Markku Savela , Jarkko Sakkinen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux API , Michael Kerrisk , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1 Message-ID: <20150226203308.GA18926@mail.hallyn.com> References: <20150224154715.GA20682@mail.hallyn.com> <20150224164429.GB29685@ubuntumail> <20150225033247.GC29685@ubuntumail> <20150226153524.GC15182@mail.hallyn.com> <20150226193200.GA17709@mail.hallyn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:38:01AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:28:30PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > >> On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > >> > >> > > Well doing that breaks su. > >> > > >> > Don't what exactly? You're saying that doing > >> > > >> > pI' = pI > >> > pA' = pA (pA is ambient) > >> > pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & (fI | pA)) > >> > pE' = pP' & (fE | pA) > >> > > >> > stopped su from having CAP_SETGID while > >> > > >> > pI' = pI > >> > pA' = pA (pA is ambient) > >> > pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & (fI | pA)) > >> > pE' = pP' & fE > >> > > >> > worked? I'll hope you're saying both "fail", in which case > >> > >> fE does not exist in cpu_vfs_cap_data. We only get fI and fP. Why in the > >> world does setcap allow setting fE? > > > > It sets a bit in the magic_etc. So fE is either all on or all off. > > > >> V1 does not use fE. In my newer attempt, I seemed to have worked > >> with zeroed field that I assumed was filled in. > >> > >> I will just do > >> > >> pE' = pP' > >> > >> Ok? > > > > Andrew Morgan was against that. What if we changed > > > > pE' = pP' & (fE | pA) > > > > to > > > > if (pA) > > pE' = pP' & fE > > else > > pE' = pP' > > > > Is this backwards? D'oh, yes. > Also, on further bikeshedding consideration, I think I like the name > "persistent" much better than "ambient". Alas, "persistent" starts > with a P. > > --Andy