From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755574AbbCBRVN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:21:13 -0500
Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]:56814 "EHLO
	mail-qa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753881AbbCBRVL (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:21:11 -0500
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:21:08 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>,
        Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.19: device name associates with IRQ's for ahci controllers
 operating with a single IRQ changed from "ahci?" to "<BDF>"
Message-ID: <20150302172108.GN17694@htj.duckdns.org>
References: <534449189.20150209205457@eikelenboom.it>
 <54D9B9FA.9030900@canonical.com>
 <20150210145120.GI3220@htj.duckdns.org>
 <20150216172841.GA23072@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150216172841.GA23072@agordeev.usersys.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello,

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 05:28:42PM +0000, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> The problem dates back to commit 4f37b50 ("libata: Use dev_name() for
> request_irq() to distinguish devices"). If the commit is considered valid
> then <BDF> still might be legitimate as well. Not sure what is the best
> approach here.

What does <BDF> indicate?  Does it successfully identify the device in
question?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun