From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754958AbbCFEVT (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 23:21:19 -0500 Received: from lgeamrelo02.lge.com ([156.147.1.126]:45429 "EHLO lgeamrelo02.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751373AbbCFEVR (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 23:21:17 -0500 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.220.203 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@kernel.org Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:17:04 +0900 From: Namhyung Kim To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Frederic Weisbecker , Adrian Hunter , Stephane Eranian , Andi Kleen , David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/38] perf tools: Handle indexed data file properly Message-ID: <20150306041704.GA7872@sejong> References: <1425352070-1115-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1425352070-1115-8-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <20150304161954.GA24380@krava.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150304161954.GA24380@krava.brq.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jiri, On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:19:54PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:07:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > When perf detects data file has index table, process header part first > > and then rest data files in a row. Note that the indexed sample data is > > recorded for each cpu/thread separately, it's already ordered with > > respect to themselves so no need to use the ordered event queue > > interface. > > > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim > > --- > > tools/perf/util/session.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > > tools/perf/util/session.h | 5 ++++ > > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c > > index e4f166981ff0..00cd1ad427be 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c > > @@ -1300,11 +1300,10 @@ fetch_mmaped_event(struct perf_session *session, > > #define NUM_MMAPS 128 > > #endif > > > > -static int __perf_session__process_events(struct perf_session *session, > > +static int __perf_session__process_events(struct perf_session *session, int fd, > > u64 data_offset, u64 data_size, > > u64 file_size, struct perf_tool *tool) > > { > > - int fd = perf_data_file__fd(session->file); > > why is 'fd' passed separatelly here? we have single file now > and the only 'file::fd' we use is in session, no? You're right, it's a leftover from the old code. Will change. Thanks, Namhyung