On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 05:08:08PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:11:49AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Maxime Ripard > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 07:59:24PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> >> The Hummingbird A31 has an AMPAK AP6210 WiFi+Bluetooth module. The > >> >> WiFi part is a BCM43362 IC connected to MMC1 in the A31 SoC via SDIO. > >> >> The IC also takes a power enable signal via GPIO. This is supported > >> >> with the new power sequencing bindings. > >> >> > >> >> The WiFi module supports out-of-band interrupt signaling via GPIO, > >> >> but this is buggy and not enabled yet. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > >> > > >> > There's two almost identical patches 12/12. Which one am I suppose to > >> > apply? > >> > >> This one is the right one. I forgot to clear the patches after changing > >> the description. The "buggy" part in the description is probably not > >> needed. Hans explained that the SD resets have nothing to do with > >> interrupt handling. > > > > Just to be clear, you want the last sentence to be: > > > > The WiFi module supports out-of-band interrupt signaling via GPIO, but > > this is not enabled yet. > > > > Right? > > That's right. Thanks. Ack. I just applied it without the buggy mention. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com