From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932943AbbCPVEs (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:04:48 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:37799 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932210AbbCPVEr (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:04:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:59:57 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Pavel Machek , Rob Herring , Will Deacon , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Sebastian Reichel , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Nicolas Pitre , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision Message-ID: <20150316205956.GE12397@atomide.com> References: <201502271645.58765@pali> <20150316181023.GT5264@atomide.com> <20150316195904.GN8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201503162154.27450@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <201503162154.27450@pali> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Pali Rohár [150316 13:54]: > On Monday 16 March 2015 20:59:04 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:10:26AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux [150316 > > > 09:15]: > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 08:44:10AM -0700, Tony Lindgren > > > > wrote: > > > > > * Pavel Machek [150302 03:32]: > > > > > > On Fri 2015-02-27 16:55:26, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > > > > This patch adds support for DT "/revision" and > > > > > > > convert ATAG_REVISION to DT. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pali Rohár (2): > > > > > > > arm: devtree: Set system_rev from DT revision > > > > > > > arm: boot: convert ATAG_REVISION to DT revision > > > > > > > field > > > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek > > > > > > > > > > Are these queued somewhere now? Sounds like this is the > > > > > last pending issue for n900 to use legacy user space > > > > > with current mainline kernels, so I'd like to get these > > > > > in so we can get closer to making omap3 boot in device > > > > > tree only mode. > > > > > > > > Not that I know of. As everyone is aware, patches need to > > > > be in my patch system if they want me to apply them - > > > > which would've been especially important as I was away > > > > from kernel stuff for a week at the start of March (for > > > > medical reasons) and I can't be expected to track the > > > > status of stuff which is buried behind 1000+ extra mails. > > > > > > Pali, care to upload these two patches to Russell's patch > > > tracking system if no other comments? > > > > If it's done soon, I should be able to send them to Linus > > fairly quickly, since this problem I'm grappling with is > > being seen by others who have better tools to be able to > > investigate the problem (and hence they're in a better > > position to investigate what's going on.) > > I have no idea how to upload those patches into tracking system. > Right now I do not have enough time for testing any patches... Well it's pretty easy, all you have to do is upload them to: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ There's an email interface it too. > Tony, or somebody else, if you have free time, can you upload > (my) patches to that needed tracking system? Eeek, I'm swamped too, probably best that you do it yourself since they're your patches. Regards, Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:59:57 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision In-Reply-To: <201503162154.27450@pali> References: <201502271645.58765@pali> <20150316181023.GT5264@atomide.com> <20150316195904.GN8656@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201503162154.27450@pali> Message-ID: <20150316205956.GE12397@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Pali Roh?r [150316 13:54]: > On Monday 16 March 2015 20:59:04 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:10:26AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux [150316 > > > 09:15]: > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 08:44:10AM -0700, Tony Lindgren > > > > wrote: > > > > > * Pavel Machek [150302 03:32]: > > > > > > On Fri 2015-02-27 16:55:26, Pali Roh?r wrote: > > > > > > > This patch adds support for DT "/revision" and > > > > > > > convert ATAG_REVISION to DT. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pali Roh?r (2): > > > > > > > arm: devtree: Set system_rev from DT revision > > > > > > > arm: boot: convert ATAG_REVISION to DT revision > > > > > > > field > > > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek > > > > > > > > > > Are these queued somewhere now? Sounds like this is the > > > > > last pending issue for n900 to use legacy user space > > > > > with current mainline kernels, so I'd like to get these > > > > > in so we can get closer to making omap3 boot in device > > > > > tree only mode. > > > > > > > > Not that I know of. As everyone is aware, patches need to > > > > be in my patch system if they want me to apply them - > > > > which would've been especially important as I was away > > > > from kernel stuff for a week at the start of March (for > > > > medical reasons) and I can't be expected to track the > > > > status of stuff which is buried behind 1000+ extra mails. > > > > > > Pali, care to upload these two patches to Russell's patch > > > tracking system if no other comments? > > > > If it's done soon, I should be able to send them to Linus > > fairly quickly, since this problem I'm grappling with is > > being seen by others who have better tools to be able to > > investigate the problem (and hence they're in a better > > position to investigate what's going on.) > > I have no idea how to upload those patches into tracking system. > Right now I do not have enough time for testing any patches... Well it's pretty easy, all you have to do is upload them to: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ There's an email interface it too. > Tony, or somebody else, if you have free time, can you upload > (my) patches to that needed tracking system? Eeek, I'm swamped too, probably best that you do it yourself since they're your patches. Regards, Tony