From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752417AbbCQHVy (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:21:54 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:33452 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751656AbbCQHVw (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:21:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:51:41 +0530 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Benjamin Romer , David Kershner , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, sparmaintainer@unisys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] staging: unisys: remove unused variables Message-ID: <20150317072105.GA6009@sudip-PC> References: <1426181412-19112-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20150316153519.GB12503@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150316153519.GB12503@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 04:35:19PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:00:09PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > these variable were being assigned some values but never reused. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee > > --- > > > > v2: no change > > Then why resend? > > confused, sorry for the confusion. but i was sending v2 of the series and this patch from that series had no change. so in that case should i mark the subject of this patch as [PATCH v2] or should it be just [PATCH] ? regards sudip > > greg k-h