From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756006AbbCSOAj (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:00:39 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:57120 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751794AbbCSOAf (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:00:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:00:31 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Namhyung Kim Cc: Wang Nan , jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, lizefan@huawei.com, pi3orama@163.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: report: don't allow empty argument for '-t'. Message-ID: <20150319140031.GH2983@kernel.org> References: <20150313112046.GA28773@danjae.skbroadband> <1426251114-198991-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <550A6FA6.7080805@huawei.com> <20150319072624.GA24055@sejong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150319072624.GA24055@sejong> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:26:24PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:41:42PM +0800, Wang Nan wrote: > > Hi Namhyung Kim, > > Hello, > > > > > Do you have any comment on it? > > As I said in previous reply, I think perf 'diff' and 'mem' have same > problem. So how about fix them altogether? So you are ok with this change, right? Can I cound that as an ack? I.e. he could send the other fixes as separate patch(es). - Arnaldo