From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752511AbbCTOaM (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:30:12 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0091.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.91]:50953 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750977AbbCTOaJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:30:09 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:966:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:1981:2194:2196:2199:2200:2393:2553:2559:2562:2895:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3350:3622:3865:3867:3870:3872:3874:4385:5007:6261:7875:7901:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13255:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: bat10_756d562493f4d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1744 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:30:05 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Clark Williams , linux-rt-users , Mike Galbraith , "Paul E. McKenney" , =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling Message-ID: <20150320103005.3914fd8d@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20150320103120.GZ23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20150318144946.2f3cc982@gandalf.local.home> <20150320103120.GZ23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:31:20 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Parts-suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt > > OK, queued it. Feel free to update that loop. > Do we want to look into making the same change for > deadline once this has settled? Hmm, looks like it could use it as well. Should that code be made a bit more generic to share the same algorithm? Would need to pass in a pointer to the mask to check. -- Steve