From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Euan Harris <euan.harris@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/29] libxl: Cancelling asynchronous
 operations
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:39:23 +0000
Message-ID: <20150320103923.GB10985@citrix.com>
References: <1423599016-32639-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
	<1425384484.24959.135.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1425384484.24959.135.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:08:04PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > I wouldn't recommend testing it yet until I've at least smoke tested
> > it to see that things still work if you don't cancel them.
> 
> Would review of the series be useful and/or appreciated at this stage?
> 
> Perhaps the first half dozen or so look like preparatory cleanups which
> I could sensibly look at?

Yes, that would be great.   I've read through the whole series fairly carefully,
and it looks sensible, but you will be better placed to see whether it fits well
with the rest of libxl.

Thanks,
Euan