From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752502AbbCWNaU (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:30:20 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0089.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.89]:33370 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752013AbbCWNaR (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:30:17 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1540:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2194:2199:2393:2553:2559:2562:2736:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3870:3871:3872:3874:5007:6119:6261:7875:7903:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:14096:14097:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: cake82_3c6c3e71a0210 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2093 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:30:13 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Petr Mladek Cc: Ingo Molnar , Masami Hiramatsu , "David S. Miller" , Anil S Keshavamurthy , Ananth NMavinakayanahalli , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Kosina , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kprobes: Disable Kprobe when ftrace arming fails Message-ID: <20150323093013.15b6070b@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20150323123955.GE15177@pathway.suse.cz> References: <1426860127-7896-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz> <20150323085426.GB28965@gmail.com> <20150323101253.GN11869@pathway.suse.cz> <20150323103327.GA12213@gmail.com> <20150323123955.GE15177@pathway.suse.cz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:39:55 +0100 Petr Mladek wrote: > > wth is a 'universe' in this context? > > We use the term "universe" to define whether the system or task uses > original or patched functions. It is especially important for patches > that modify semantic of functions. They need more complex consistency > model. It defines when it is safe time for the system or task to start > using the new functions (switch to the new universe). > > In theory, different tasks might be in more universes if more patches are > being applied. In practice, we deal with only two universes. The trick is > that we allow to add new patch only when the whole system has switched > to the previous one. > Is this terminology documented anywhere upstream yet? -- Steve