From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
Ananth NMavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kprobes: Disable Kprobe when ftrace arming fails
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:58:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150323095853.56eae095@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150323135306.GA25233@gmail.com>
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:53:06 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > I think it has to do with their RCU like patching functionality,
> > where some tasks are still executing the old function and others are
> > executing the new function. [...]
>
> That would be the 'function with pending patch' state in my
> description above.
That could be considered a bit confusing too, because the patch isn't
pending, it's already applied. But this is getting off topic, as the
code for this isn't even in mainline yet, so I agree that the use of
terminology that has not been upstreamed yet should be avoided.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-20 14:02 [PATCH v3] kprobes: Disable Kprobe when ftrace arming fails Petr Mladek
2015-03-23 8:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-23 10:12 ` Petr Mladek
2015-03-23 10:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-23 12:39 ` Petr Mladek
2015-03-23 13:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-23 13:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-23 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-23 13:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-23 13:58 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2015-03-23 16:38 ` Petr Mladek
2015-03-23 16:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 23:32 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-03-23 22:36 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-03-24 7:59 ` Petr Mladek
2015-03-24 13:36 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150323095853.56eae095@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.