From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753118AbbCXToI (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:44:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:34234 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752218AbbCXToG (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:44:06 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:44:02 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Brad Spengler , Linus Torvalds , Borislav Petkov , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Lutomirski , Denys Vlasenko , "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Add user_mode_ignore_vm86() Message-ID: <20150324194402.GA27598@gmail.com> References: <202c56ca63823c338af8e2e54948dbe222da6343.1426728647.git.luto@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:26 AM, tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski > wrote: > > Commit-ID: a67e7277d01ccfd39b0db5a198c2643cc19dd79c > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a67e7277d01ccfd39b0db5a198c2643cc19dd79c > > Author: Andy Lutomirski > > AuthorDate: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:33:29 -0700 > > Committer: Ingo Molnar > > CommitDate: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:13:36 +0100 > > > > x86/asm/entry: Add user_mode_ignore_vm86() > > > > user_mode() is dangerous and user_mode_vm() has a confusing name. > > > > Add user_mode_ignore_vm86() (equivalent to current user_mode()). > > We'll change the small number of legitimate users of user_mode() > > to user_mode_ignore_vm86(). > > > > Inspired by grsec, although this works rather differently. > > Ingo, does this mean that you changed your mind or do you still want > a patch to delete user_mode_ignore_vm86 and just use user_mode > everywhere instead? Would be still nice to have it as an add on patch, if you agree with my arguments. I picked up your series as-is because it's correct and because it already improves things a lot in this area. Thanks, Ingo