From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2015, #08; Mon, 23) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:04:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20150324200428.GA29202@peff.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 24 21:04:40 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YaV41-000441-6s for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:04:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752850AbbCXUEd (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:04:33 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:37948 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752222AbbCXUEc (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:04:32 -0400 Received: (qmail 25474 invoked by uid 102); 24 Mar 2015 20:04:32 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.1) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:04:32 -0500 Received: (qmail 7246 invoked by uid 107); 24 Mar 2015 20:04:45 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:04:45 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:04:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 01:02:35PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > * jk/test-chain-lint (2015-03-22) 28 commits > [...] > > What I queued here has fix to the issue J6t found in 15/25 squashed > > in, and also has 26/25 and 27/25 follow-up fixes from Michael, plus > > 28/25 follow-up from Torsten. If everybody involved is happy with > > it, we can just proceed with this copy, otherwise I'll let Peff > > reroll. I am happy either way. > > I'll merge this to 'next' soonish, unless I hear otherwise. I > double checked 15/25 (i.e. $feature{"forks"}{"default"} = [1];) > so I think we are in good shape. Thanks, yeah, I think what you have queued is good. -Peff