From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 01:04:40 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/5] clk: shmobile: rcar-gen2: Add CPG Clock Domain support Message-Id: <20150325010440.GC1767@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <1426708017-28885-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1426708017-28885-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20150324230036.7930.50037@quantum> In-Reply-To: <20150324230036.7930.50037@quantum> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Mike, On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:00:36PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2015-03-18 12:46:53) > > Add Clock Domain support to the R-Car Gen2 Clock Pulse Generator (CPG) > > driver using the generic PM Domain. This allows to power-manage the > > module clocks of SoC devices that are part of the CPG Clock Domain using > > Runtime PM, or for system suspend/resume. > > > > SoC devices that are part of the CPG Clock Domain and can be > > power-managed through their primary clock should be tagged in DT with a > > proper "power-domains" property. > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Looks good to me. Which tree do you want this patch to go through? My tree seems reasonable from my point of view. Though at this point it would be targeted at v4.2. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/5] clk: shmobile: rcar-gen2: Add CPG Clock Domain support Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:04:40 +0900 Message-ID: <20150325010440.GC1767@verge.net.au> References: <1426708017-28885-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1426708017-28885-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20150324230036.7930.50037@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150324230036.7930.50037@quantum> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Turquette Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Stephen Boyd , Magnus Damm , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kevin Hilman , Ulf Hansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Mike, On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:00:36PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2015-03-18 12:46:53) > > Add Clock Domain support to the R-Car Gen2 Clock Pulse Generator (CPG) > > driver using the generic PM Domain. This allows to power-manage the > > module clocks of SoC devices that are part of the CPG Clock Domain using > > Runtime PM, or for system suspend/resume. > > > > SoC devices that are part of the CPG Clock Domain and can be > > power-managed through their primary clock should be tagged in DT with a > > proper "power-domains" property. > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Looks good to me. Which tree do you want this patch to go through? My tree seems reasonable from my point of view. Though at this point it would be targeted at v4.2. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:04:40 +0900 Subject: [PATCH/RFC 1/5] clk: shmobile: rcar-gen2: Add CPG Clock Domain support In-Reply-To: <20150324230036.7930.50037@quantum> References: <1426708017-28885-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1426708017-28885-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20150324230036.7930.50037@quantum> Message-ID: <20150325010440.GC1767@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mike, On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:00:36PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2015-03-18 12:46:53) > > Add Clock Domain support to the R-Car Gen2 Clock Pulse Generator (CPG) > > driver using the generic PM Domain. This allows to power-manage the > > module clocks of SoC devices that are part of the CPG Clock Domain using > > Runtime PM, or for system suspend/resume. > > > > SoC devices that are part of the CPG Clock Domain and can be > > power-managed through their primary clock should be tagged in DT with a > > proper "power-domains" property. > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Looks good to me. Which tree do you want this patch to go through? My tree seems reasonable from my point of view. Though at this point it would be targeted at v4.2.