From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752139AbbCZKT0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2015 06:19:26 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:51760 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751042AbbCZKTZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2015 06:19:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:19:23 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk, boaz@plexistor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: add a is_e820_ram() helper Message-ID: <20150326101923.GA29148@lst.de> References: <1427358764-6126-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1427358764-6126-3-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150326090215.GA11520@gmail.com> <20150326093424.GA28217@lst.de> <20150326100413.GA19739@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150326100413.GA19739@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:04:13AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Yeah, the code is much clearer now: > > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar > > What tree is this intended for? Should I pick up the x86 bits? The x86 bits really need to go through the x86 tree. The pmem driver itself would normally go through the block tree, but if Jens is fine with it sending it through the x86 tree as well would allow us to have a single complete tree for testing.