From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2578B7F50 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:38:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2372AC003 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:38:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [173.255.197.46]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id OfwxEd3EMgGmmxvl for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 08:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:38:48 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] NFSD: Add support for encoding multiple segments Message-ID: <20150326153848.GB30482@fieldses.org> References: <20150319153627.GA20852@fieldses.org> <20150320151718.GD2036@fieldses.org> <20150320162303.GA18786@infradead.org> <20150320182621.GH2036@fieldses.org> <20150324174916.GA28906@infradead.org> <55142405.3090000@Netapp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Trond Myklebust Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , Marc Eshel , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org, Anna Schumaker On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:32:25AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Anna Schumaker > wrote: > > Here are my updated numbers! I tested with files 5G in size: one 100% data, one 100% hole, and one alternating between hole and data every 4K. I collected data for both v4.1 and v4.2 with and without the READ_PLUS patches: > > > > ########################## > > # # > > # Without READ_PLUS # > > # # > > ########################## > > > > > > NFS v4.1: > > Trial > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | Data | 8.723s | 7.243s | 8.252s | 6.997s | 6.980s | 7.639s | > > | Hole | 5.271s | 5.224s | 5.060s | 4.897s | 5.321s | 5.155s | > > | Mixed | 8.050s | 10.057s | 7.919s | 8.060s | 9.557s | 8.729s | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > > > > > > > > > NFS v4.2: > > Trial > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | Data | 6.707s | 7.070s | 6.722s | 6.761s | 6.810s | 6.814s | > > | Hole | 5.152s | 5.149s | 5.213s | 5.206s | 5.312s | 5.206s | > > | Mixed | 7.979s | 7.985s | 8.177s | 7.772s | 8.280s | 8.039s | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > > > > > > > > > > > ####################### > > # # > > # With READ_PLUS # > > # # > > ####################### > > > > > > NFS v4.1: > > Trial > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | Data | 9.082s | 7.008s | 7.116s | 6.771s | 7.902s | 7.576s | > > | Hole | 5.333s | 5.358s | 5.380s | 5.161s | 5.282s | 5.303s | > > | Mixed | 8.189s | 8.308s | 9.540s | 7.937s | 8.420s | 8.479s | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > > > > > > > > > NFS v4.2: > > Trial > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | Data | 7.033s | 6.829s | 7.025s | 6.873s | 7.134s | 6.979s | > > | Hole | 1.794s | 1.800s | 1.905s | 1.811s | 1.725s | 1.807s | > > | Mixed | 7.590s | 8.777s | 9.423s | 10.366s | 8.024s | 8.836s | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > > > So there is a clear win in the 100% hole case here, but otherwise the > statistical fluctuations are dominating the numbers. Can you get us a > little more stats and then perhaps run the results through nfsometer? Also, could you describe the setup (are these still kvm's), and how you're clearing the cache between runs? --b. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:45305 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752418AbbCZPiv (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:38:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:38:48 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Trond Myklebust Cc: Anna Schumaker , Christoph Hellwig , Marc Eshel , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] NFSD: Add support for encoding multiple segments Message-ID: <20150326153848.GB30482@fieldses.org> References: <20150319153627.GA20852@fieldses.org> <20150320151718.GD2036@fieldses.org> <20150320162303.GA18786@infradead.org> <20150320182621.GH2036@fieldses.org> <20150324174916.GA28906@infradead.org> <55142405.3090000@Netapp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:32:25AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Anna Schumaker > wrote: > > Here are my updated numbers! I tested with files 5G in size: one 100% data, one 100% hole, and one alternating between hole and data every 4K. I collected data for both v4.1 and v4.2 with and without the READ_PLUS patches: > > > > ########################## > > # # > > # Without READ_PLUS # > > # # > > ########################## > > > > > > NFS v4.1: > > Trial > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | Data | 8.723s | 7.243s | 8.252s | 6.997s | 6.980s | 7.639s | > > | Hole | 5.271s | 5.224s | 5.060s | 4.897s | 5.321s | 5.155s | > > | Mixed | 8.050s | 10.057s | 7.919s | 8.060s | 9.557s | 8.729s | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > > > > > > > > > NFS v4.2: > > Trial > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | Data | 6.707s | 7.070s | 6.722s | 6.761s | 6.810s | 6.814s | > > | Hole | 5.152s | 5.149s | 5.213s | 5.206s | 5.312s | 5.206s | > > | Mixed | 7.979s | 7.985s | 8.177s | 7.772s | 8.280s | 8.039s | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > > > > > > > > > > > ####################### > > # # > > # With READ_PLUS # > > # # > > ####################### > > > > > > NFS v4.1: > > Trial > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | Data | 9.082s | 7.008s | 7.116s | 6.771s | 7.902s | 7.576s | > > | Hole | 5.333s | 5.358s | 5.380s | 5.161s | 5.282s | 5.303s | > > | Mixed | 8.189s | 8.308s | 9.540s | 7.937s | 8.420s | 8.479s | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > > > > > > > > > NFS v4.2: > > Trial > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Average | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > | Data | 7.033s | 6.829s | 7.025s | 6.873s | 7.134s | 6.979s | > > | Hole | 1.794s | 1.800s | 1.905s | 1.811s | 1.725s | 1.807s | > > | Mixed | 7.590s | 8.777s | 9.423s | 10.366s | 8.024s | 8.836s | > > |---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------|---------| > > > > So there is a clear win in the 100% hole case here, but otherwise the > statistical fluctuations are dominating the numbers. Can you get us a > little more stats and then perhaps run the results through nfsometer? Also, could you describe the setup (are these still kvm's), and how you're clearing the cache between runs? --b.