From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752828AbbC3LVM (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:21:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50324 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750938AbbC3LVL (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:21:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:21:08 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: David Ahern Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Stephane Eranian , LKML Subject: Re: [BUG] segfault in perf-top -- thread refcnt Message-ID: <20150330112108.GG1413@krava> References: <551593EA.2030201@gmail.com> <20150327201126.GM21510@kernel.org> <5515B9E6.5020007@gmail.com> <20150330080737.GD1413@krava> <20150330102220.GE1413@krava> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150330102220.GE1413@krava> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:22:20PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:07:37AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > SNIP > > > > > > > 2 things: > > > 1. let run for a long time. go about using the server. do lots of builds, > > > etc. it takes time > > > > > > 2. use a box with a LOT of cpus (1024 in my case) > > > > > > Make sure ulimit is set to get the core. > > > > reproduced under 24 cpu box with kernel build (make -j25) > > running on background.. will try to look closer > > > > perf: Segmentation fault > > -------- backtrace -------- > > ./perf[0x4fd79b] > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x358f0)[0x7f9cbff528f0] > > ./perf(thread__put+0x5b)[0x4b1a7b] > > ./perf(hists__delete_entries+0x70)[0x4c8670] > > ./perf[0x436a88] > > ./perf[0x4fa73d] > > ./perf(perf_evlist__tui_browse_hists+0x97)[0x4fc437] > > ./perf[0x4381d0] > > /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x7ee5)[0x7f9cc1ff2ee5] > > /lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f9cc0011b8d] > > [0x0] > > looks like race among __machine__findnew_thread and thread__put > over the machine->threads rb_tree insert/removal > > is there a reason why thread__put does not erase itself from machine->threads? > > I'm trying attached patch.. so far so gut ;-) arghh.. it blowed up during the lunch :-\ jirka