On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:10:05AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 24/03/2015 23:32, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> OK, that one I prefer.  Are you OK with: 
> >>> qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy calls ->
> >>> save_live_complete_precopy
> >>> 
> >>> qemu_savevm_state_complete_postcopy calls ->
> >>> save_live_complete_postcopy
> >>> 
> >>> ?
> > Sounds ok to me.  Fwiw, I was thinking that both the
> > complete_precopy and complete_postcopy hooks should always be
> > called.  For a non-postcopy migration, the postcopy hooks would
> > just be called immediately after the precopy hooks.
> 
> What about then calling them save_live_after_precopy and
> save_live_complete, or having save_live_before_postcopy and
> save_live_complete?

Good idea.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson