From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756153AbbCaRZF (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:25:05 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:56189 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752554AbbCaRZA (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:25:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:24:58 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Boaz Harrosh , linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk Subject: Re: another pmem variant V2 Message-ID: <20150331172458.GA3037@lst.de> References: <1427358764-6126-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <55143A8B.2060304@plexistor.com> <20150331092526.GA25958@lst.de> <551AB9C7.6020505@plexistor.com> <20150331161648.GA1318@lst.de> <20150331164456.GB8462@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150331164456.GB8462@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 06:44:56PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > I'd be fine with that too - mind sending an updated series? I will send an updated one tonight or early tomorrow. Btw, do you want to keep the E820_PRAM name instead of E820_PMEM? Seems like most people either don't care or prefer E820_PMEM. I'm fine either way.