From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753797AbbDAOok (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:44:40 -0400 Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:47467 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753324AbbDAOoi (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:44:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:44:31 +0200 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Vladimir Davydov Cc: Andrew Morton , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/memcg: update memcg/kmem status Message-ID: <20150401164431.1e88220a@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <1427898636-4505-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com> References: <1427898636-4505-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:30:36 +0300 Vladimir Davydov wrote: > Memcg/kmem reclaim support has been finally merged. Reflect this in the > documentation. So the text you've removed says not to select kmem support "unless for development purposes." Do we now believe that this feature is ready for use in a production setting? If the answer is "yes," I'd be happy to take this through the docs tree. jon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E3C6B0038 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:44:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by obvd1 with SMTP id d1so82868324obv.0 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:44:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vena.lwn.net (tex.lwn.net. [70.33.254.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d9si2194559oeu.105.2015.04.01.07.44.38 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:44:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:44:31 +0200 From: Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/memcg: update memcg/kmem status Message-ID: <20150401164431.1e88220a@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <1427898636-4505-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com> References: <1427898636-4505-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Vladimir Davydov Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:30:36 +0300 Vladimir Davydov wrote: > Memcg/kmem reclaim support has been finally merged. Reflect this in the > documentation. So the text you've removed says not to select kmem support "unless for development purposes." Do we now believe that this feature is ready for use in a production setting? If the answer is "yes," I'd be happy to take this through the docs tree. jon -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/memcg: update memcg/kmem status Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:44:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20150401164431.1e88220a@lwn.net> References: <1427898636-4505-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1427898636-4505-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Vladimir Davydov Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:30:36 +0300 Vladimir Davydov wrote: > Memcg/kmem reclaim support has been finally merged. Reflect this in the > documentation. So the text you've removed says not to select kmem support "unless for development purposes." Do we now believe that this feature is ready for use in a production setting? If the answer is "yes," I'd be happy to take this through the docs tree. jon