From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753042AbbDBQsf (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:48:35 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0059.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.59]:36742 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751666AbbDBQsc (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:48:32 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3867:3870:3871:3872:3874:5007:6119:6261:7875:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12050:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: twig36_2d2b29d989b5d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1880 Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:48:29 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Shuah Khan Cc: Namhyung Kim , Masami Hiramatsu , LKML , =?UTF-8?B?UMOhZHJhaWc=?= Brady , Michael Ellerman , Dave Jones , Luis Henriques Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.1] ftracetest: Do not use usleep directly Message-ID: <20150402124829.5b617bcd@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <551D6E8D.6040504@osg.samsung.com> References: <1427948663-25048-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1427949253-26883-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <551CDA6C.50106@hitachi.com> <20150402093827.617192f0@gandalf.local.home> <551D5019.9010806@osg.samsung.com> <20150402110846.4e6a756c@gandalf.local.home> <551D6E8D.6040504@osg.samsung.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 10:30:05 -0600 Shuah Khan wrote: > >> Anyway, I have this patch tagged for 4.1-rc2 > > > > Why rc2? > > I usually let the patches stay in next for a few days before > I send pull request. It is getting close to that, so decided > on rc2 as a better choice. > > We are at rc-6 at the moment, maybe there is enough time for > this to get into rc-1 > But the merge window closes at the rc1 release. Is this also a "stable" thing? It should be labeled as such if that's the case. -- Steve