From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751986AbbDMWeE (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:34:04 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:45097 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751300AbbDMWeA (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:34:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 01:33:49 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Mateusz Kulikowski Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] staging: rtl8192e: Fix more checkpatch.pl warnings Message-ID: <20150413223349.GB10964@mwanda> References: <1428961664-4241-1-git-send-email-mateusz.kulikowski@gmail.com> <20150413221222.GA10964@mwanda> <552C401D.4000108@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <552C401D.4000108@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:15:57AM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: > I made checkpatch regressions in v1 (that I missed at a time) As near as I can tell the only difference is that you left some curly braces in on patch 8 of first set and removed them on the second set. It's not worth resending the whole series for trivial stuff like that which can be fixed later. But fine. > > I will mark (reply-all) v1 as "do-not-apply" - Will that be enough? Yes. regards, dan carpenter