From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Yhojy-0005Nu-HI for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 00:30:11 +0000 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:29:44 +0900 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kexec: remove ordering constraints from -x (--no-ifdown) and -y (--no-sync) Message-ID: <20150414002944.GB10790@verge.net.au> References: <20150326191608.GE1953@htj.duckdns.org> <20150326191644.GF1953@htj.duckdns.org> <20150413170156.GH2596@htj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150413170156.GH2596@htj.duckdns.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Chris Mason , kexec@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 01:01:56PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:16:44PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > From 81b5889b49f0f2448c3e9543c5c936d52348910c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Tejun Heo > > Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:11:09 -0400 > > > > Currently, the two options must be the last ones to be honored; > > otherwise, they can get silently ignored and both the manpage and help > > text point it out. This is error-prone and trivial to fix. There > > isn't much point in pointing something out in documentation when the > > peculiarity can be removed with four lines of extra code. > > > > Update option handling so that the two arguments are honored > > regardless of their positions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > > Ping? Hi Tejun, For some reason I don't seem to have this patch in my inbox. Could you repost it? _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec