From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753529AbbDNJkj (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 05:40:39 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:45959 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752323AbbDNJk3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 05:40:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:40:17 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Liam Girdwood , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Hai Li , Rob Clark , Dave Airlie Message-ID: <20150414094017.GM6023@sirena.org.uk> References: <20150409143309.3a1fac67@canb.auug.org.au> <20150409093556.GP6023@sirena.org.uk> <20150414094403.30126f2d@canb.auug.org.au> <20150414010706.GB29061@sonymobile.com> <20150414112241.3dbad71a@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SnJOJGP8ShXoHvY2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150414112241.3dbad71a@canb.auug.org.au> X-Cookie: I've been there. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.94.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --SnJOJGP8ShXoHvY2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:22:41AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:07:06 -0700 Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > Your patch looks correct and should preferrably be added to the drm > > tree, or the last patch in my series that drops the API wrapper should > > be held back until rc1(?) > It needs to be sent to Linus as a merge fix when the drm tree is merged. Or the DRM tree could pull my tree I guess - Rob/David, I can make a tag specifically for this branch if you like? --SnJOJGP8ShXoHvY2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVLOCAAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQLuAH/A/mb5DOfxenjo01icwJv72s i4mWOevqOPtBhrdms99hMO099q59FBof3n447Hpl+gMXjSLBsEz6V14310Kwb5Qq ydFzoaA7VEkOTeNPqCrD3JZHB/snI5P4mYzW+H6uUCanRJNolA210OSlIZPD+TdQ TrwSO5LMj8iKM00VoO3bifWTNcbdC/tQAg4lhS07IyPhR+71CnJtPLXhHipMYl4U MAkbAAATJbWV3YgslCyemvIlhHfE4gYCLn2yaGIZynOmmC029QBSRdLEpOcgUqUC lCNQKXARplWj2MdT9Pjg1y76KzBHKeX63JO5jJ7patiDsDe9V/D+sdkv3SYxWvM= =bEoU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SnJOJGP8ShXoHvY2--