From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933924AbbDQOAC (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:00:02 -0400
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:49504 "EHLO
	aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933600AbbDQN7y (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:59:54 -0400
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:59:27 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: driverdevel <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jun Tian <jun.j.tian@intel.com>,
        Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Garret Kelly <garret.kelly@gmail.com>,
        Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>,
        Andreas <schwab@linux-m68k.org>, Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] Fix pointer cast for 32 bits arch
Message-ID: <20150417135927.GP10964@mwanda>
References: <20150413122911.GW10964@mwanda>
 <1429191546-1398-1-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com>
 <CAMuHMdWmJmQTqgp4JkXO+-H3sy86o8v=XKJuKmQ-G63LDndq9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150416170144.GM10964@mwanda>
 <1429203927.2878.238.camel@linux.intel.com>
 <20150417081134.GN10964@mwanda>
 <20150417082017.GO10964@mwanda>
 <1429277509.2878.258.camel@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1429277509.2878.258.camel@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 02:31:49PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 11:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Actually, my patch seems like a good idea to me but it's one of those
> > things that someone should probably test.  Unless someone can test
> > goldfish on a 32 bit system with 64 bit dma addresses 
> 
> No such "system" exists.

I don't understand.  We definitely can have 64bit dma addresses on
x86_32.

regards,
dan carpenter