From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
williams@redhat.com, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
fweisbec@redhat.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] context_tracking,x86: remove extraneous irq disable & enable from context tracking on syscall entry
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 18:34:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150501163431.GB1327@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5543A94B.3020108@redhat.com>
* Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I can understand people running hard-RT workloads not wanting to
> > see the overhead of a timer tick or a scheduler tick with variable
> > (and occasionally heavy) work done in IRQ context, but the jitter
> > caused by a single trivial IPI with constant work should be very,
> > very low and constant.
>
> Not if the realtime workload is running inside a KVM guest.
I don't buy this:
> At that point an IPI, either on the host or in the guest, involves a
> full VMEXIT & VMENTER cycle.
So a full VMEXIT/VMENTER costs how much, 2000 cycles? That's around 1
usec on recent hardware, and I bet it will get better with time.
I'm not aware of any hard-RT workload that cannot take 1 usec
latencies.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-01 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 21:23 [PATCH 0/3] reduce nohz_full syscall overhead by 10% riel
2015-04-30 21:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] reduce indentation in __acct_update_integrals riel
2015-04-30 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] remove local_irq_save from __acct_update_integrals riel
2015-04-30 21:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] context_tracking,x86: remove extraneous irq disable & enable from context tracking on syscall entry riel
2015-04-30 21:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-01 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-01 15:20 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-01 15:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-01 16:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-01 16:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-01 16:26 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-01 16:34 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-05-01 18:05 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-01 18:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-01 19:11 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-01 19:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-02 5:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-02 18:27 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-03 18:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-07 10:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-04 9:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-04 13:30 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-04 14:06 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-04 14:19 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-04 15:59 ` question about RCU dynticks_nesting Rik van Riel
2015-05-04 18:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-04 19:39 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-04 20:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-04 20:13 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-04 20:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-04 20:53 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-05 5:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-06 1:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-06 3:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-06 6:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-06 6:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-06 7:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-07 0:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-05-07 15:44 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-04 19:00 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-04 19:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-04 19:59 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-04 20:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-05 10:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-05 12:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-05 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-05 18:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-05 21:09 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-06 5:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-05 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-05 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-05 12:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-02 4:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] context_tracking,x86: remove extraneous irq disable & enable from context tracking on syscall entry Mike Galbraith
2015-05-01 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-01 16:40 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-01 16:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-01 16:54 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-01 17:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-01 17:22 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-01 17:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-01 16:22 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-01 16:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-03 13:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-05-03 17:30 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-03 18:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-03 18:52 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-07 10:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-07 12:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-05-07 12:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-07 15:47 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-08 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-07 12:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-07 12:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-07 12:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-08 6:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-07 12:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-07 15:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-07 17:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-08 6:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-08 10:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-08 11:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-08 12:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-08 13:27 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150501163431.GB1327@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=fweisbec@redhat.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.