From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752563AbbEFFxn (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2015 01:53:43 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:51485 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751464AbbEFFxl (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2015 01:53:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 22:53:39 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Mike Turquette , YH Chen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Henry Chen , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Matthias Brugger , Yingjoe Chen , Eddie Huang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Document devicetree bindings for clock/reset controllers Message-ID: <20150506055339.GB10871@codeaurora.org> References: <1429778143-2074-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1429778143-2074-7-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20150501012039.GG32407@codeaurora.org> <20150504083852.GJ4946@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150504083852.GJ4946@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/04, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:20:39PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 04/23, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > +The available clocks are defined in dt-bindings/clock/mt*-clk.h. > > > + > > > +Example: > > > + > > > +apmixedsys: apmixedsys@10209000 { > > > > apmixedsys: clock-controller@10209000 { > > > > would be more standard. The same comment applies throughout this > > patch. Otherwise it looks good to me. > > For apmixed this I agree, but the others are also reset controllers, so > I'm not sure if clock-controller is appropriate. Personally I don't care > much, I'll change to whatever you like. I've already applied the patch, so if you like you can send a follow up. Perhaps power-controller is more appropriate? I'm not too worried about it though. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Document devicetree bindings for clock/reset controllers Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 22:53:39 -0700 Message-ID: <20150506055339.GB10871@codeaurora.org> References: <1429778143-2074-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1429778143-2074-7-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20150501012039.GG32407@codeaurora.org> <20150504083852.GJ4946@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150504083852.GJ4946-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Mike Turquette , YH Chen , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Henry Chen , linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, Matthias Brugger , Yingjoe Chen , Eddie Huang , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05/04, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:20:39PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 04/23, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > +The available clocks are defined in dt-bindings/clock/mt*-clk.h. > > > + > > > +Example: > > > + > > > +apmixedsys: apmixedsys@10209000 { > > > > apmixedsys: clock-controller@10209000 { > > > > would be more standard. The same comment applies throughout this > > patch. Otherwise it looks good to me. > > For apmixed this I agree, but the others are also reset controllers, so > I'm not sure if clock-controller is appropriate. Personally I don't care > much, I'll change to whatever you like. I've already applied the patch, so if you like you can send a follow up. Perhaps power-controller is more appropriate? I'm not too worried about it though. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 22:53:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Document devicetree bindings for clock/reset controllers In-Reply-To: <20150504083852.GJ4946@pengutronix.de> References: <1429778143-2074-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1429778143-2074-7-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20150501012039.GG32407@codeaurora.org> <20150504083852.GJ4946@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20150506055339.GB10871@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/04, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:20:39PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 04/23, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > +The available clocks are defined in dt-bindings/clock/mt*-clk.h. > > > + > > > +Example: > > > + > > > +apmixedsys: apmixedsys at 10209000 { > > > > apmixedsys: clock-controller at 10209000 { > > > > would be more standard. The same comment applies throughout this > > patch. Otherwise it looks good to me. > > For apmixed this I agree, but the others are also reset controllers, so > I'm not sure if clock-controller is appropriate. Personally I don't care > much, I'll change to whatever you like. I've already applied the patch, so if you like you can send a follow up. Perhaps power-controller is more appropriate? I'm not too worried about it though. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project