From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] netlink: rename private flags and states Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 13:49:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20150507114956.GB16619@pox.localdomain> References: <1430906288-5108-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <1430989373-4515-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <1430989373-4515-7-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, ebiederm@xmission.com To: Nicolas Dichtel Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:35802 "EHLO mail-wg0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751643AbbEGLt7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2015 07:49:59 -0400 Received: by wggy19 with SMTP id y19so1384901wgg.2 for ; Thu, 07 May 2015 04:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1430989373-4515-7-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/07/15 at 11:02am, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > These flags and states have the same prefix (NETLINK_) that netlink socket > options. To avoid confusion and to be able to name a flag like a socket > option, let's use an other prefix: NETLINK_[S|F]_. > > Note: a comment has been fixed, it was talking about > NETLINK_RECV_NO_ENOBUFS socket option instead of NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel Acked-by: Thomas Graf