From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] arm64: Mark PMU interrupt IRQF_NO_THREAD Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 18:10:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20150514171056.GH18984@arm.com> References: <1430167990-12333-1-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <1430167990-12333-2-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <20150514153937.GB13442@linutronix.de> <20150514154215.GE18984@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Catalin Marinas , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Anders Roxell , "ayyappa.ch.linux@gmail.com" , "linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kevin.hilman@linaro.org" To: Kevin Hilman Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:40019 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933230AbbENRLA (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 13:11:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:09:23PM +0100, Kevin Hilman wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 04:39:37PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >> * Anders Roxell | 2015-04-27 22:53:08 [+0200]: > >> > >> >Mark the PMU interrupts as non-threadable, as is the case with > >> >arch/arm: d9c3365 ARM: 7813/1: Mark pmu interupt IRQF_NO_THREAD > >> > > >> >Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > >> >Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell > >> Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > >> > >> Could this please go via the arm64 tree? > > > > I already acked it: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/23/161 > > > > so it will be picked up for 4.2. > > Which tree is at applied to? I'm not seeing it in -next, and couldn't > find it in any branches of the arm64 tree[1]. Sorry to pester, I'm > just looking to cherry-pick it from it's proper upstream for testing > with a stable/3.18 based kernel. I don't think Catalin has started putting together our for-next/core branch yet, but I'd expect it to appear there when he picks it up. Will From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 18:10:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCHv2 1/3] arm64: Mark PMU interrupt IRQF_NO_THREAD In-Reply-To: References: <1430167990-12333-1-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <1430167990-12333-2-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <20150514153937.GB13442@linutronix.de> <20150514154215.GE18984@arm.com> Message-ID: <20150514171056.GH18984@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:09:23PM +0100, Kevin Hilman wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 04:39:37PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >> * Anders Roxell | 2015-04-27 22:53:08 [+0200]: > >> > >> >Mark the PMU interrupts as non-threadable, as is the case with > >> >arch/arm: d9c3365 ARM: 7813/1: Mark pmu interupt IRQF_NO_THREAD > >> > > >> >Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > >> >Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell > >> Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > >> > >> Could this please go via the arm64 tree? > > > > I already acked it: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/23/161 > > > > so it will be picked up for 4.2. > > Which tree is at applied to? I'm not seeing it in -next, and couldn't > find it in any branches of the arm64 tree[1]. Sorry to pester, I'm > just looking to cherry-pick it from it's proper upstream for testing > with a stable/3.18 based kernel. I don't think Catalin has started putting together our for-next/core branch yet, but I'd expect it to appear there when he picks it up. Will