From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anders Roxell Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] arch/arm64: Enable PREEMPT_RT_FULL Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:08:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20150515120810.GA10988@8074w.roxell.se> References: <1430167990-12333-1-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <1430167990-12333-4-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <20150514155723.GD13442@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: ayyappa.ch.linux@gmail.com, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kevin.hilman@linaro.org To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]:36064 "EHLO mail-la0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934325AbbEOMIP (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 08:08:15 -0400 Received: by lagv1 with SMTP id v1so116124536lag.3 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 05:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150514155723.GD13442@linutronix.de> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2015-05-14 17:57, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Anders Roxell | 2015-04-27 22:53:10 [+0200]: > > >arm64 is missing support for PREEMPT_RT. The main feature which is > >lacking is support for lazy preemption. The arch-specific entry code, > > I'm taking this but I am renaming the subject. Lazy preempt is not > required by -RT but supporting it benefits it. That means you could run > arm64 without it. Thanks for picking up the patch and fixing the subject, though I was surprised to see the ownership changed. Cheers, Anders From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: anders.roxell@linaro.org (Anders Roxell) Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:08:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv2 3/3] arch/arm64: Enable PREEMPT_RT_FULL In-Reply-To: <20150514155723.GD13442@linutronix.de> References: <1430167990-12333-1-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <1430167990-12333-4-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <20150514155723.GD13442@linutronix.de> Message-ID: <20150515120810.GA10988@8074w.roxell.se> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2015-05-14 17:57, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Anders Roxell | 2015-04-27 22:53:10 [+0200]: > > >arm64 is missing support for PREEMPT_RT. The main feature which is > >lacking is support for lazy preemption. The arch-specific entry code, > > I'm taking this but I am renaming the subject. Lazy preempt is not > required by -RT but supporting it benefits it. That means you could run > arm64 without it. Thanks for picking up the patch and fixing the subject, though I was surprised to see the ownership changed. Cheers, Anders