From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992451AbbEOP46 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 11:56:58 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178]:35306 "EHLO mail-qc0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934665AbbEOP45 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 11:56:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 11:56:53 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: mingo@kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, dedekind1@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, juri.lelli@arm.com, Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] sched: Fix a race between __kthread_bind() and sched_setaffinity() Message-ID: <20150515155653.GA23692@htj.duckdns.org> References: <20150515154333.712161952@infradead.org> <20150515154833.545640346@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150515154833.545640346@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 05:43:34PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Because sched_setscheduler() checks p->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY > without locks, a caller might observe an old value and race with the > set_cpus_allowed_ptr() call from __kthread_bind() and effectively undo > it. > > __kthread_bind() > do_set_cpus_allowed() > > sched_setaffinity() > if (p->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITIY) > set_cpus_allowed_ptr() > p->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY > > Fix the issue by putting everything under the regular scheduler locks. > > This also closes a hole in the serialization of > task_struct::{nr_,}cpus_allowed. > > Cc: Tejun Heo > Cc: Oleg Nesterov > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) For workqueue part, Acked-by: Tejun Heo Please route anyway you see fit. Thanks. -- tejun