All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	ian.campbell@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, tim@xen.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com,
	JBeulich@suse.com, yang.z.zhang@intel.com,
	Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/13] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 20:17:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150518191743.GJ9503@zion.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55555157.3000604@intel.com>

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 09:52:23AM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
[...]
> 
> 
> ...
> 
> B<RDM_RESERVE_STRING> has the form C<[KEY=VALUE,KEY=VALUE,...> where:
> 
> =over 4
> 
> =item B<KEY=VALUE>
> 
> Possible B<KEY>s are:
> 
> =over 4
> 
> =item B<type="STRING">
> 
> Currently we just have one type. "host" means all reserved device memory on
> this platform should be reserved in this VM's pfn space.
> 
> =over 4
> 
> =item B<reserve="STRING">
> ...
> 

Yes, something like this.

> 
> >
> >>>
[...]
> >>>>index 9af0e99..d7434d6 100644
> >>>>--- a/docs/misc/vtd.txt
> >>>>+++ b/docs/misc/vtd.txt
> >>>>@@ -111,6 +111,40 @@ in the config file:
> >>>>  To override for a specific device:
> >>>>  	pci = [ '01:00.0,msitranslate=0', '03:00.0' ]
> >>>>
> >>>>+RDM, 'reserved device memory', for PCI Device Passthrough
> >>>>+---------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>+
> >>>>+There are some devices the BIOS controls, for e.g. USB devices to perform
> >>>>+PS2 emulation. The regions of memory used for these devices are marked
> >>>>+reserved in the e820 map. When we turn on DMA translation, DMA to those
> >>>>+regions will fail. Hence BIOS uses RMRR to specify these regions along with
> >>>>+devices that need to access these regions. OS is expected to setup
> >>>>+identity mappings for these regions for these devices to access these regions.
> >>>>+
> >>>>+While creating a VM we should reserve them in advance, and avoid any conflicts.
> >>>>+So we introduce user configurable parameters to specify RDM resource and
> >>>>+according policies,
> >>>>+
> >>>>+To enable this globally, add "rdm" in the config file:
> >>>>+
> >>>>+    rdm = [ 'host, reserve=force/try' ]
> >>>>+
> >>>
> >>>The "force/try" should be called "policy". And then you explain what
> >>>policies we have.
> >>
> >>Do you mean we should rename this?
> >>
> >>rdm = [ 'host, policy=force/try' ]
> >>
> >
> >No, I didn't ask you to rename that.
> >
> >The above line is an example which should reflect the correct syntax.
> >"force/try" is not the *actual syntax*, i.e. you won't write that in
> >your config file.
> >
> >I meant to changes it to "reserve=POLICY". Then you explain the possible
> >values of POLICY.
> >
> 
> Understood so what about this,
> 
> To enable this globally, add "rdm" in the config file:
> 
>     rdm = [ 'host, reserve=<POLICY>' ]
> 

OK, so this is a specific example in vtd.txt. Last time I misread it as
part of the manpage.

I think you meant in this specific example (with other suggestions
incorporated):

     rdm = "type=host, reserve=force"

Then you point user to xl.cfg manpage.

> Or just for a specific device:
> 
>     pci = [ '01:00.0,rdm_reserve=<POLICY>', '03:00.0' ]
> 

Same here.

Just don't write "force/try" or "strcit/relax" because that's not the
exact syntax you would use in a real config file.

> Global RDM parameter allows user to specify reserved regions explicitly.
> Using "host" to include all reserved regions reported on this platform
> which is good to handle hotplug scenario. In the future this parameter
> may be further extended to allow specifying random regions, e.g. even
> those belonging to another platform as a preparation for live migration
> with passthrough devices.
> 
> Currently "POLICY" includes two options, "strict" and "relaxed". It decides
> how to handle conflict when reserving RDM regions in pfn space. If conflict
> ...
> 
> >>This is really a policy but 'reserve' may can reflect our action explicitly,
> >>right?
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>+Or just for a specific device:
> >>>>+
> >>>>+	pci = [ '01:00.0,rdm_reserve=force/try', '03:00.0' ]
> >>
> >>And you also can see this.
> >>
> >>But anyway, if you're really stick to rename this, I'm going to be fine as
> >>well but we should ping every one to check this point since this name is
> >>from our previous discussion.
> >>
> >>>>+
> >>>>+Global RDM parameter allows user to specify reserved regions explicitly.
> >>>>+Using 'host' to include all reserved regions reported on this platform
> >>>>+which is good to handle hotplug scenario. In the future this parameter
> >>>>+may be further extended to allow specifying random regions, e.g. even
> >>>>+those belonging to another platform as a preparation for live migration
> >>>>+with passthrough devices.
> >>>>+
> >>>>+'force/try' policy decides how to handle conflict when reserving RDM
> >>>>+regions in pfn space. If conflict exists, 'force' means an immediate error
> >>>>+so VM will be killed, while 'try' allows moving forward with a warning
> >>>
> >>>Be killed by whom? I think it's hvmloader crashes voluntarily, right?
> >>
> >>s/VM will be kille/hvmloader crashes voluntarily
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>+message thrown out.
> >>>>+
> >>>>
> >>>>  Caveat on Conventional PCI Device Passthrough
> >>>>  ---------------------------------------------
> >>>>diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
> >>>>index 98687bd..9ed40d4 100644
> >>>>--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
> >>>>+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
> >>>>@@ -1407,6 +1407,11 @@ static void domcreate_attach_pci(libxl__egc *egc, libxl__multidev *multidev,
> >>>>      }
> >>>>
> >>>>      for (i = 0; i < d_config->num_pcidevs; i++) {
> >>>>+        /*
> >>>>+         * If the rdm global policy is 'force' we should override each device.
> >>>>+         */
> >>>>+        if (d_config->b_info.rdm.reserve == LIBXL_RDM_RESERVE_FLAG_FORCE)
> >>>>+            d_config->pcidevs[i].rdm_reserve = LIBXL_RDM_RESERVE_FLAG_FORCE;
> >>>>          ret = libxl__device_pci_add(gc, domid, &d_config->pcidevs[i], 1);
> >>>>          if (ret < 0) {
> >>>>              LIBXL__LOG(ctx, LIBXL__LOG_ERROR,
> >>>>diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl
> >>>>index 47af340..5786455 100644
> >>>>--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl
> >>>>+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl
> >>>>@@ -71,6 +71,17 @@ libxl_domain_type = Enumeration("domain_type", [
> >>>>      (2, "PV"),
> >>>>      ], init_val = "LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_INVALID")
> >>>>
> >>>>+libxl_rdm_reserve_type = Enumeration("rdm_reserve_type", [
> >>>>+    (0, "none"),
> >>>>+    (1, "host"),
> >>>>+    ])
> >>>>+
> >>>>+libxl_rdm_reserve_flag = Enumeration("rdm_reserve_flag", [
> >>>>+    (-1, "invalid"),
> >>>>+    (0, "force"),
> >>>>+    (1, "try"),
> >>>>+    ])
> >>>
> >>>If you don't set init_val, the default value would be "force" (0), is this
> >>
> >>Yes.
> >>
> >>>want you want?
> >>
> >>We have a little bit of complexity here,
> >>
> >>"Default per-device RDM policy is 'force', while default global RDM policy
> >>is 'try'. When both policies are specified on a given region, 'force' is
> >>always preferred."
> >>
> >
> >This is going to be done in actual code anyway.
> >
> >This type is used both in global and per-device setting, so I envisage
> 
> Yes.
> 
> >this to have an invalid value to start with. Appropriate default values
> 
> Sounds I should set this,
> 
> +libxl_rdm_reserve_flag = Enumeration("rdm_reserve_flag", [
> +    (-1, "invalid"),
> +    (0, "strict"),
> +    (1, "relaxed"),
> +    ], init_val = "LIBXL_RDM_RESERVE_FLAG_INVALID")
> +
> 

Yes, and then don't forget to set the value to appropriate value in the
_setdefault functions for different types.

> 
> >should be done in libxl_TYPE_setdefault functions. And the logic to
> >detect conflict and preferences done in your construct function.
> >
> >What do you think?
> >
> >>>
> >>>>+

[...]

> >>>>                      pcidev->permissive = atoi(tok);
> >>>>                  }else if ( !strcmp(optkey, "seize") ) {
> >>>>                      pcidev->seize = atoi(tok);
> >>>>+                }else if ( !strcmp(optkey, "rdm_reserve") ) {
> >>>>+                    if ( !strcmp(tok, "force") ) {
> >>>>+                        pcidev->rdm_reserve = LIBXL_RDM_RESERVE_FLAG_FORCE;
> >>>>+                    } else if ( !strcmp(tok, "try") ) {
> >>>>+                        pcidev->rdm_reserve = LIBXL_RDM_RESERVE_FLAG_TRY;
> >>>>+                    } else {
> >>>>+                        pcidev->rdm_reserve = LIBXL_RDM_RESERVE_FLAG_FORCE;
> >>>>+                        XLU__PCI_ERR(cfg, "Unknown PCI RDM property flag value:"
> >>>>+                                          " %s, so goes 'force' by default.",
> >>>
> >>>If this is not an error, you don't need XLU__PCI_ERR.
> >>>
> >>>But I would say we should  just treat this as an error and
> >>>abort/exit/report (whatever the parser should do in this case).
> >>
> >>In our case we just want to post a message to set a appropriate flag to
> >>recover this behavior like we write here,
> >>
> >>                         XLU__PCI_ERR(cfg, "Unknown PCI RDM property flag
> >>value:"
> >>                                           " %s, so goes 'strict' by
> >>default.",
> >>                                      tok);
> >
> >I suggest we just abort in this case and not second guess what the admin
> >wants.
> 
> Okay,
>                     } else {
>                         XLU__PCI_ERR(cfg, "%s is not an valid PCI RDM
> property"
>                                           " flag: 'strict' or 'relaxed'.",
>                                      tok);
>                         abort();
> 

No, not calling the "abort" function. I meant returning appropriate error
value and let the caller handles this situation.

> 
> >
> >>
> >>This may just be a warning? But I don't we have this sort of definition,
> >>XLU__PCI_WARN, ...
> >>
> >>So what LOG format can be adopted here?
> >
> >Feel free to introduce XLU__PCI_WARN if it turns out to be necessary.
> 
> If it goes to abort(), I think XLU__PCI_ERR() should be good.
> 
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>+                                     tok);
> >>>>+                    }
> >>>>                  }else{
> >>>>                      XLU__PCI_ERR(cfg, "Unknown PCI BDF option: %s", optkey);
> >>>>                  }
> >>>>@@ -167,6 +180,71 @@ parse_error:
> >>>>      return ERROR_INVAL;
> >>>>  }
> >>>>
> >>>>+int xlu_rdm_parse(XLU_Config *cfg, libxl_rdm_reserve *rdm, const char *str)
> >>>>+{
> >>>>+    unsigned state = STATE_TYPE;
> >>>>+    char *buf2, *tok, *ptr, *end;
> >>>>+
> >>>>+    if ( NULL == (buf2 = ptr = strdup(str)) )
> >>>>+        return ERROR_NOMEM;
> >>>>+
> >>>>+    for(tok = ptr, end = ptr + strlen(ptr) + 1; ptr < end; ptr++) {
> >>>>+        switch(state) {
> >
> >Coding style. I haven't checked what actual style this file uses, but
> >there is inconsistency in this function by itself.
> 
> I just refer to xlu_pci_parse_bdf() to generate xlu_rdm_parse(), and they
> are in the same file...
> 
> Anyway, I should change this line,
> 
> for ( tok = ptr, end = ptr + strlen(ptr) + 1; ptr < end; ptr++ ) {
> 

  for (tok = ptr, end...)

  switch (state) {


> >
> >>>>+        case STATE_TYPE:
> >>>>+            if ( *ptr == '\0' || *ptr == ',' ) {
> >>>>+                state = STATE_CHECK_FLAG;
> >>>>+                *ptr = '\0';

[...]

> >>>>
> >>>>+    /*
> >>>>+     * By default our global policy is to query all rdm entries, and
> >>>>+     * force reserve them.
> >>>>+     */
> >>>>+    b_info->rdm.type = LIBXL_RDM_RESERVE_TYPE_HOST;
> >>>>+    b_info->rdm.reserve = LIBXL_RDM_RESERVE_FLAG_TRY;
> >>>
> >>>This should probably to into the _setdefault function of
> >>>libxl_domain_build_info.
> >>
> >>Sorry, I just see this
> >>
> >>libxl_domain_build_info_init()
> >>     |
> >>     + libxl_rdm_reserve_init(&p->rdm);
> >>	|
> >>	+ memset(p, '\0', sizeof(*p));
> >>
> >>But this should be generated automatically, right? So how to implement your
> >>idea? Could you give me a show?
> >>
> >
> >Check libxl_domain_build_info_setdefault.
> >
> >To use libxl types. You normally do:
> >
> >   libxl_TYPE_init
> >   libxl_TYPE_setdefault
> >
> >   DO STUFF
> >
> >   libxl_TYPE_dispose
> >
> >_init and _dispose are auto-generated. _setdefault is not.
> 
> So in our case, maybe we can do this,
> 
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
> index f0da7dc..461606c 100644
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,17 @@ static int sched_params_valid(libxl__gc *gc,
>      return 1;
>  }
> 
> +void libxl__device_rdm_setdefault(libxl__gc *gc,
> +                                  libxl_domain_build_info *b_info)

It's not a device. Use libxl__rdm_setdefault.

> +{
> +    /*
> +     * By default our global policy is to query all rdm entries, and
> +     * force reserve them.
> +     */
> +    b_info->rdm.type = LIBXL_RDM_RESERVE_TYPE_HOST;
> +    b_info->rdm.reserve = LIBXL_RDM_RESERVE_FLAG_STRICT;
> +}
> +

Isn't the global policy "relaxed" (or "try")? At least that's what your
old code does. BTW your original code contradicts your original comment.

>  int libxl__domain_build_info_setdefault(libxl__gc *gc,
>                                          libxl_domain_build_info *b_info)
>  {
> @@ -410,6 +421,8 @@ int libxl__domain_build_info_setdefault(libxl__gc *gc,
>                     libxl_domain_type_to_string(b_info->type));
>          return ERROR_INVAL;
>      }
> +
> +    libxl__device_rdm_setdefault(gc, b_info);
>      return 0;
>  }
> 

And you also need to modify libxl__device_pci_setdefault.

I actually have another question on the interface design. To recap, in
your patch:

diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl
index 47af340..5786455 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl
@@ -71,6 +71,17 @@ libxl_domain_type = Enumeration("domain_type", [
     (2, "PV"),                                                    
     ], init_val = "LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_INVALID")

+libxl_rdm_reserve_type = Enumeration("rdm_reserve_type", [
+    (0, "none"),
+    (1, "host"),
+    ])
+
+libxl_rdm_reserve_flag = Enumeration("rdm_reserve_flag", [
+    (-1, "invalid"),
+    (0, "force"),
+    (1, "try"),
+    ])
+
 libxl_channel_connection = Enumeration("channel_connection", [
     (0, "UNKNOWN"),
     (1, "PTY"),    
@@ -356,6 +367,11 @@ libxl_domain_sched_params = Struct("domain_sched_params",[
     ("budget",       integer, {'init_val': 'LIBXL_DOMAIN_SCHED_PARAM_BUDGET_DEFAULT'}),
     ])

+libxl_rdm_reserve = Struct("rdm_reserve", [
+    ("type",    libxl_rdm_reserve_type),
+    ("reserve",   libxl_rdm_reserve_flag),
+    ])
+
 libxl_domain_build_info = Struct("domain_build_info",[
     ("max_vcpus",       integer),                     
     ("avail_vcpus",     libxl_bitmap),
@@ -401,6 +417,7 @@ libxl_domain_build_info = Struct("domain_build_info",[
     ("kernel",           string),
     ("cmdline",          string),
     ("ramdisk",          string),
+    ("rdm",     libxl_rdm_reserve),
     ("u", KeyedUnion(None, libxl_domain_type, "type",
                 [("hvm", Struct(None, [("firmware",         string),
                                        ("bios",             libxl_bios_type),
@@ -521,6 +538,7 @@ libxl_device_pci = Struct("device_pci", [
     ("power_mgmt", bool),
     ("permissive", bool),
     ("seize", bool),
+    ("rdm_reserve",   libxl_rdm_reserve_flag),
     ])

Do you actually need libxl_rdm_reserve type? I.e. do you envisage that
structure to change a lot? Can you not just use libxl_rdm_reserve_type
and libxl_rdm_reserve_flag in build_info.

Wei.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-18 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-10  9:21 [RFC][PATCH 00/13] Fix RMRR Tiejun Chen
2015-04-10  9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/13] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy Tiejun Chen
2015-05-08 13:04   ` Wei Liu
2015-05-11  5:35     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-11 14:54       ` Wei Liu
2015-05-15  1:52         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-18  1:06           ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-18 19:17           ` Wei Liu [this message]
2015-05-19  3:16             ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-19  9:42               ` Wei Liu
2015-05-19 10:50                 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-19 11:00                   ` Wei Liu
2015-05-20  5:27                     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-20  8:36                       ` Wei Liu
2015-05-20  8:51                         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-20  9:07                           ` Wei Liu
2015-04-10  9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/13] introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-04-16 14:59   ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-16 15:10     ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-16 15:24       ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-16 15:40         ` Tian, Kevin
2015-04-23 12:32       ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-23 12:59         ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-24  1:17           ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-24  7:21             ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-10  9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/13] tools/libxc: Expose new hypercall xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-05-08 13:07   ` Wei Liu
2015-05-11  5:36     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-11  9:50       ` Wei Liu
2015-04-10  9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/13] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM Tiejun Chen
2015-04-15 13:10   ` Ian Jackson
2015-04-15 18:22     ` Tian, Kevin
2015-04-23 12:31     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-20 11:13   ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-06 15:00     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-06 15:34       ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-07  2:22         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-07  6:04           ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-08  1:14             ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-08  1:24           ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-08 15:13             ` Wei Liu
2015-05-11  6:06               ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-08 14:43   ` Wei Liu
2015-05-11  8:09     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-11 11:32       ` Wei Liu
2015-05-14  8:27         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-18  1:06           ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-18 20:00           ` Wei Liu
2015-05-19  1:32             ` Tian, Kevin
2015-05-19 10:22               ` Wei Liu
2015-05-19  6:47             ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-10  9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/13] xen/x86/p2m: introduce set_identity_p2m_entry Tiejun Chen
2015-04-16 15:05   ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-23 12:33     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-10  9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/13] xen:vtd: create RMRR mapping Tiejun Chen
2015-04-16 15:16   ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-16 15:50     ` Tian, Kevin
2015-04-10  9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/13] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-04-16 15:40   ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-23 12:32     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-23 13:05       ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-23 13:59       ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-23 14:26         ` Tim Deegan
2015-05-04  8:15         ` Tian, Kevin
2015-04-20 13:36   ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-11  8:37     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-08 16:07   ` Julien Grall
2015-05-11  8:42     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-11  9:51       ` Julien Grall
2015-05-11 10:57         ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-14  5:48           ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-14 20:13             ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-14  5:47         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-14 10:19           ` Julien Grall
2015-04-10  9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/13] tools: extend xc_assign_device() " Tiejun Chen
2015-04-20 13:39   ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-11  9:45     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-11 10:53       ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-14  7:04         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-10  9:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/13] xen: enable XENMEM_set_memory_map in hvm Tiejun Chen
2015-04-16 15:42   ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-20 13:46   ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  2:33     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  6:12       ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  6:24         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  6:35           ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  6:59             ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-10  9:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/13] tools: extend XENMEM_set_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-04-10 10:01   ` Wei Liu
2015-04-13  2:09     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-13 11:02       ` Wei Liu
2015-04-14  0:42         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-05  9:32           ` Wei Liu
2015-04-20 13:51   ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  2:57     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  6:16       ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  7:09         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  7:32           ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  7:51             ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-10  9:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/13] hvmloader: get guest memory map into memory_map[] Tiejun Chen
2015-04-20 13:57   ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  3:10     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-10  9:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/13] hvmloader/pci: skip reserved ranges Tiejun Chen
2015-04-20 14:21   ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  3:18     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  6:19       ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  7:34         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  7:44           ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  8:16             ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  8:31               ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  9:21                 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  9:32                   ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-10  9:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/13] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table Tiejun Chen
2015-04-20 14:29   ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  6:11     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  6:25       ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  6:39         ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  6:56           ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  7:11             ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  7:34               ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  8:00                 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  8:12                   ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  8:47                     ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15  8:54                       ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15  9:18                         ` Chen, Tiejun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150518191743.GJ9503@zion.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
    --cc=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.