All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 00/12] arm/arm64: Unify PSCI client support
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 10:03:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150519090313.GA11175@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150518174957.GT21251@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 06:49:57PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:38:11AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > This series unifies the 32-bit and 64-bit PSCI client code, moving the bulk of
> > the FW invocation and probing out to a common locaiton in drivers/firmware.
> > As part of this, the remaining edge cases for PSCI 0.2 (Trusted OSs rejecting
> > CPU_OFF) are accounted for, maknig both 32-bit adn 64-bit clients more robust.
> > 
> > This results in a reasonable saving in terms of lines of code, and will allow
> > for PSCI 1.0 support to be unified form the beginning, avoiding further
> > duplication.
> > 
> > The series is based on v4.1-rc3.
> > 
> > Since v1 [1]:
> > * Fix build when PSCI isn't selected
> > * Don't indirect migrate_info_up_cpu
> > * Fix ver to u32 in psci_get_version
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Mark.
> > 
> > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-May/341770.html
> > 
> > Mark Rutland (12):
> >   arm/arm64: kvm: add missing PSCI include
> >   arm64: smp_plat: add get_logical_index
> >   arm64: smp: consistently use error codes
> >   arm64: psci: remove unnecessary id indirection
> >   arm64: psci: support unsigned return values
> >   arm64: psci: account for Trusted OS instances
> >   arm64: psci: kill psci_power_state
> >   arm64: psci: remove ACPI coupling
> >   arm64: psci: factor invocation code to drivers
> >   drivers: psci: support native SMC{32,64} calls
> >   ARM: migrate to common PSCI client code
> >   MAINTAINERS: add PSCI entry
> 
> So, apart from some comments I had, the series looks fine.
> 
> How do you plan to merge this? I'm happy for it to go through the
> arm-soc tree (hopefully there are no conflicts with some of Lorenzo's
> patches for the unification of ACPI/DT CPU initialisation).

Unfortunately I think there are (minor, owing to PSCI headers reshuffling,
but to be sorted out), let me know please the preferred way to merge the
two sets.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-19  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-18 10:38 [PATCHv2 00/12] arm/arm64: Unify PSCI client support Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 01/12] arm/arm64: kvm: add missing PSCI include Mark Rutland
2015-05-19  3:37   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 02/12] arm64: smp_plat: add get_logical_index Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:09   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-18 17:55     ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-19  3:47       ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-19  8:31       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19  9:10         ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 03/12] arm64: smp: consistently use error codes Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19  8:17   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 04/12] arm64: psci: remove unnecessary id indirection Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:28   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19  8:21   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 05/12] arm64: psci: support unsigned return values Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19  8:25   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 06/12] arm64: psci: account for Trusted OS instances Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:33   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 07/12] arm64: psci: kill psci_power_state Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:36   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-18 18:11     ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 08/12] arm64: psci: remove ACPI coupling Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:38   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19  8:40   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-19  9:18     ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 09/12] arm64: psci: factor invocation code to drivers Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:40   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19  8:46   ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 10/12] drivers: psci: support native SMC{32,64} calls Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:43   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-18 17:49     ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 11/12] ARM: migrate to common PSCI client code Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:45   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-18 10:38 ` [PATCHv2 12/12] MAINTAINERS: add PSCI entry Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 17:45   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-18 17:49 ` [PATCHv2 00/12] arm/arm64: Unify PSCI client support Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19  9:03   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2015-05-19  9:32     ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-19 15:20       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-05-19  8:54 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-05-19  9:33   ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150519090313.GA11175@red-moon \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.