From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754763AbbESSNq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 19 May 2015 14:13:46 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:53920 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752446AbbESSNm (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 19 May 2015 14:13:42 -0400
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:13:34 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, cpuinfo x86_model_id whitespace cleanup
Message-ID: <20150519181334.GM4641@pd.tnic>
References: <1432050210-32036-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com>
 <CAMzpN2iJr7GVWm5peLxHvUc2geAgWVVqQ-q91SFEBy6LSuJZcA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMzpN2iJr7GVWm5peLxHvUc2geAgWVVqQ-q91SFEBy6LSuJZcA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 01:25:59PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> Using strlcpy in this manner could fail if it does larger than byte
> copies and they overlap.

Why?

AFAICT, strlcpy() calls memcpy() and memcpy should handle overlapping
buffers just fine.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--