All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Cc: "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>, "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Linux PCI" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: iproc: add bcma pcie driver
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 18:14:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150519231456.GX31666@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55539B63.2060203@hauke-m.de>

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 08:43:47PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 05/13/2015 06:30 PM, Ray Jui wrote:
> > Hi Rafal,
> > 
> > On 5/13/2015 9:19 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> On 13 May 2015 at 17:56, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> wrote:
> >>> On 5/12/2015 11:27 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >>>> On 12 May 2015 at 23:23, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> wrote:
> >>>>> This driver adds support for the PCIe 2.0 controller found on the bcma
> >>>>> bus. This controller can be found on (mostly) all Broadcom BCM470X /
> >>>>> BCM5301X ARM SoCs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The driver found in the Broadcom SDK does some more stuff, like setting
> >>>>> up some DMA memory areas, chaining MPS and MRRS to 512 and also some
> >>>>> PHY changes like "improving" the PCIe jitter and doing some special
> >>>>> initializations for the 3rd PCIe port.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This was tested on a bcm4708 board with 2 PCIe ports and wireless cards
> >>>>> connected to them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PCI_DOMAINS is needed by this driver, because normally there is more
> >>>>> than one PCIe controller and without PCI_DOMAINS only the first
> >>>>> controller gets registered.
> >>>>> This controller gets 6 IRQs, the last one is trigged by all IRQ events.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> +static int iproc_pcie_bcma_probe(struct bcma_device *bdev)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +       struct iproc_pcie *pcie;
> >>>>> +       LIST_HEAD(res);
> >>>>> +       struct resource res_mem;
> >>>>> +       int ret;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       pcie = devm_kzalloc(&bdev->dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>> +       if (!pcie)
> >>>>> +               return -ENOMEM;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       pcie->dev = &bdev->dev;
> >>>>> +       bcma_set_drvdata(bdev, pcie);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       pcie->base = bdev->io_addr;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       res_mem.start = bdev->addr_s[0];
> >>>>> +       res_mem.end = bdev->addr_s[0] + SZ_128M - 1;
> >>>>> +       res_mem.name = "PCIe MEM space";
> >>>>> +       res_mem.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> >>>>> +       pci_add_resource(&res, &res_mem);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       pcie->resources = &res;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       pcie->map_irq = iproc_pcie_bcma_map_irq;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       ret = iproc_pcie_setup(pcie);
> >>>>
> >>>> I think I don't like this part of iproc design. It lefts
> >>>> pcie->resources pointing to some random memory after the setup/probe
> >>>> are done. Guess it should be a separated parameter or sth.
> >>>>
> >>>> The patch is still OK, I just refer to generic iproc possible issue.
> >>>>
> >>> Sorry Rafal, but could you please be more specific on this?
> >>
> >> iproc_pcie_pltfm_probe (and iproc_pcie_bcma_probe) have local "res"
> >> variable (each its own). They do:
> >> pcie->resources = &res;
> >> and then they call
> >> iproc_pcie_setup(pcie);
> >>
> >> After iproc_pcie_pltfm_probe / iproc_pcie_bcma_probe returns, the
> >> pointer pcie->resources is not valid anymore, yet pcie struct is still
> >> in use. Of course pcie->resources isn't used anymore, but still, it's
> >> some in-struct pointer (to the random memory since local variable is
> >> not accessible anymore).
> >>
> >> I think you should drop
> >> struct list_head *resources;
> >> from the struct iproc_pcie and use
> >> iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *resources)
> >>
> > 
> > Okay thanks. That makes sense.
> > 
> > Or I should keep a copy of the resources under pcie->resources. In the
> > current pcie-iproc.c, the resource is not used anywhere else except when
> > creating the root bus under iproc_pcie_setup. But in the future, I might
> > need to add more code to explicitly program the outbound/inbound windows
> > so this driver can work with some other iProc SoCs where the desired
> > windows do not match power-on-reset values.
> > 
> > I plan to change this along with the window programming patch in the
> > future. I also think Hauke's current patch is fine.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Ray
> > 
> I think parts of this resources are allocated and never freed.
> 
> pci_add_resource() allocates some bytes, but I do not see where they are
> freed, this also applies to the platform driver.

Where are we on this patch?  I see Ray's ack for [1/2], and a "I think the
current patch is fine"; is that an ack for [2/2] as well?

Bjorn

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: bhelgaas@google.com (Bjorn Helgaas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: iproc: add bcma pcie driver
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 18:14:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150519231456.GX31666@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55539B63.2060203@hauke-m.de>

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 08:43:47PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 05/13/2015 06:30 PM, Ray Jui wrote:
> > Hi Rafal,
> > 
> > On 5/13/2015 9:19 AM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> >> On 13 May 2015 at 17:56, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com> wrote:
> >>> On 5/12/2015 11:27 PM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> >>>> On 12 May 2015 at 23:23, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> wrote:
> >>>>> This driver adds support for the PCIe 2.0 controller found on the bcma
> >>>>> bus. This controller can be found on (mostly) all Broadcom BCM470X /
> >>>>> BCM5301X ARM SoCs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The driver found in the Broadcom SDK does some more stuff, like setting
> >>>>> up some DMA memory areas, chaining MPS and MRRS to 512 and also some
> >>>>> PHY changes like "improving" the PCIe jitter and doing some special
> >>>>> initializations for the 3rd PCIe port.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This was tested on a bcm4708 board with 2 PCIe ports and wireless cards
> >>>>> connected to them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PCI_DOMAINS is needed by this driver, because normally there is more
> >>>>> than one PCIe controller and without PCI_DOMAINS only the first
> >>>>> controller gets registered.
> >>>>> This controller gets 6 IRQs, the last one is trigged by all IRQ events.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> +static int iproc_pcie_bcma_probe(struct bcma_device *bdev)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +       struct iproc_pcie *pcie;
> >>>>> +       LIST_HEAD(res);
> >>>>> +       struct resource res_mem;
> >>>>> +       int ret;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       pcie = devm_kzalloc(&bdev->dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>> +       if (!pcie)
> >>>>> +               return -ENOMEM;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       pcie->dev = &bdev->dev;
> >>>>> +       bcma_set_drvdata(bdev, pcie);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       pcie->base = bdev->io_addr;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       res_mem.start = bdev->addr_s[0];
> >>>>> +       res_mem.end = bdev->addr_s[0] + SZ_128M - 1;
> >>>>> +       res_mem.name = "PCIe MEM space";
> >>>>> +       res_mem.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> >>>>> +       pci_add_resource(&res, &res_mem);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       pcie->resources = &res;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       pcie->map_irq = iproc_pcie_bcma_map_irq;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +       ret = iproc_pcie_setup(pcie);
> >>>>
> >>>> I think I don't like this part of iproc design. It lefts
> >>>> pcie->resources pointing to some random memory after the setup/probe
> >>>> are done. Guess it should be a separated parameter or sth.
> >>>>
> >>>> The patch is still OK, I just refer to generic iproc possible issue.
> >>>>
> >>> Sorry Rafal, but could you please be more specific on this?
> >>
> >> iproc_pcie_pltfm_probe (and iproc_pcie_bcma_probe) have local "res"
> >> variable (each its own). They do:
> >> pcie->resources = &res;
> >> and then they call
> >> iproc_pcie_setup(pcie);
> >>
> >> After iproc_pcie_pltfm_probe / iproc_pcie_bcma_probe returns, the
> >> pointer pcie->resources is not valid anymore, yet pcie struct is still
> >> in use. Of course pcie->resources isn't used anymore, but still, it's
> >> some in-struct pointer (to the random memory since local variable is
> >> not accessible anymore).
> >>
> >> I think you should drop
> >> struct list_head *resources;
> >> from the struct iproc_pcie and use
> >> iproc_pcie_setup(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, struct list_head *resources)
> >>
> > 
> > Okay thanks. That makes sense.
> > 
> > Or I should keep a copy of the resources under pcie->resources. In the
> > current pcie-iproc.c, the resource is not used anywhere else except when
> > creating the root bus under iproc_pcie_setup. But in the future, I might
> > need to add more code to explicitly program the outbound/inbound windows
> > so this driver can work with some other iProc SoCs where the desired
> > windows do not match power-on-reset values.
> > 
> > I plan to change this along with the window programming patch in the
> > future. I also think Hauke's current patch is fine.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Ray
> > 
> I think parts of this resources are allocated and never freed.
> 
> pci_add_resource() allocates some bytes, but I do not see where they are
> freed, this also applies to the platform driver.

Where are we on this patch?  I see Ray's ack for [1/2], and a "I think the
current patch is fine"; is that an ack for [2/2] as well?

Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-19 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-12 21:22 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: iproc: add bcma PCIe 2.0 controller Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-12 21:22 ` Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-12 21:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: iproc: make of_irq_parse_and_map_pci() configurable Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-12 21:23   ` Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-12 22:14   ` Ray Jui
2015-05-12 22:14     ` Ray Jui
2015-05-12 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: iproc: add bcma pcie driver Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-12 21:23   ` Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-12 22:18   ` Ray Jui
2015-05-12 22:18     ` Ray Jui
2015-05-13  6:27   ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-13  6:27     ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-13 15:56     ` Ray Jui
2015-05-13 15:56       ` Ray Jui
2015-05-13 16:19       ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-13 16:19         ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-13 16:30         ` Ray Jui
2015-05-13 16:30           ` Ray Jui
2015-05-13 18:43           ` Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-13 18:43             ` Hauke Mehrtens
2015-05-19 23:14             ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-05-19 23:14               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-19 23:17               ` Ray Jui
2015-05-19 23:17                 ` Ray Jui
2015-05-20  5:27   ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-20  5:27     ` Rafał Miłecki
2015-05-12 22:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] PCI: iproc: add bcma PCIe 2.0 controller Ray Jui
2015-05-12 22:05   ` Ray Jui
2015-05-20 14:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-20 14:52   ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150519231456.GX31666@google.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: iproc: add bcma pcie driver' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.