From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756927AbbEVOcK (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2015 10:32:10 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:41488 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752617AbbEVOcG (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2015 10:32:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 07:32:05 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Thierry Reding Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Kevin Hilman , Scot Doyle , Tomi Valkeinen , Michael Kerrisk , Jiri Slaby , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Pavel Machek , Geert Uytterhoeven , lkml , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Tyler Baker , Olof Johansson , Daniel Stone Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] fbcon: use the cursor blink interval provided by vt Message-ID: <20150522143205.GA6508@kroah.com> References: <20150522020031.GA3516@kroah.com> <20150522100002.GB16507@ulmo> <3661627.JqpS87pBks@wuerfel> <20150522114957.GF16507@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150522114957.GF16507@ulmo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:49:58PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:33:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 22 May 2015 12:00:03 Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > > > Remember, if I have to hand-edit, or do something special with your > > > > patch, I will not do it, you need to do it correctly to make > > > > maintainer's lives easier, not harder, given that maintainers are the > > > > limited resouce, not developers. > > > > > > I understand. I'll make a mental note to never send you patches as > > > attachment again. > > > > > > > Better make that a general rule. My workflow is different from Greg's > > but also doesn't cope well with attachments. A lot of people in turn > > have problems quoting from an attachment when replying to the patch, > > which happens to work for me. > > Okay. Any hints on how to simplify sending out such patches with the > same list of recipients? I find it very annoying to have to manually > copy each recipient into the git send-email command-line, but I don't > know of a better way to do it. Replying to an email from the MUA will > at least do that automatically. Reply from the MUA and then just put the patch in the email body. If you have a good MUA it should be trivial to do[1] thanks, greg k-h 1) mutt drops you to your editor, and then you can just read in the patch file directly to that buffer. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] fbcon: use the cursor blink interval provided by vt Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 07:32:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20150522143205.GA6508@kroah.com> References: <20150522020031.GA3516@kroah.com> <20150522100002.GB16507@ulmo> <3661627.JqpS87pBks@wuerfel> <20150522114957.GF16507@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150522114957.GF16507@ulmo> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Kevin Hilman , Scot Doyle , Tomi Valkeinen , Michael Kerrisk , Jiri Slaby , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Pavel Machek , Geert Uytterhoeven , lkml , linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Tyler Baker , Olof Johansson , Daniel Stone List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:49:58PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:33:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 22 May 2015 12:00:03 Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > > > Remember, if I have to hand-edit, or do something special with your > > > > patch, I will not do it, you need to do it correctly to make > > > > maintainer's lives easier, not harder, given that maintainers are the > > > > limited resouce, not developers. > > > > > > I understand. I'll make a mental note to never send you patches as > > > attachment again. > > > > > > > Better make that a general rule. My workflow is different from Greg's > > but also doesn't cope well with attachments. A lot of people in turn > > have problems quoting from an attachment when replying to the patch, > > which happens to work for me. > > Okay. Any hints on how to simplify sending out such patches with the > same list of recipients? I find it very annoying to have to manually > copy each recipient into the git send-email command-line, but I don't > know of a better way to do it. Replying to an email from the MUA will > at least do that automatically. Reply from the MUA and then just put the patch in the email body. If you have a good MUA it should be trivial to do[1] thanks, greg k-h 1) mutt drops you to your editor, and then you can just read in the patch file directly to that buffer. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 14:32:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] fbcon: use the cursor blink interval provided by vt Message-Id: <20150522143205.GA6508@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <20150522020031.GA3516@kroah.com> <20150522100002.GB16507@ulmo> <3661627.JqpS87pBks@wuerfel> <20150522114957.GF16507@ulmo> In-Reply-To: <20150522114957.GF16507@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thierry Reding Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Kevin Hilman , Scot Doyle , Tomi Valkeinen , Michael Kerrisk , Jiri Slaby , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Pavel Machek , Geert Uytterhoeven , lkml , linux-fbdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Tyler Baker , Olof Johansson , Daniel Stone On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:49:58PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:33:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 22 May 2015 12:00:03 Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > > > Remember, if I have to hand-edit, or do something special with your > > > > patch, I will not do it, you need to do it correctly to make > > > > maintainer's lives easier, not harder, given that maintainers are the > > > > limited resouce, not developers. > > > > > > I understand. I'll make a mental note to never send you patches as > > > attachment again. > > > > > > > Better make that a general rule. My workflow is different from Greg's > > but also doesn't cope well with attachments. A lot of people in turn > > have problems quoting from an attachment when replying to the patch, > > which happens to work for me. > > Okay. Any hints on how to simplify sending out such patches with the > same list of recipients? I find it very annoying to have to manually > copy each recipient into the git send-email command-line, but I don't > know of a better way to do it. Replying to an email from the MUA will > at least do that automatically. Reply from the MUA and then just put the patch in the email body. If you have a good MUA it should be trivial to do[1] thanks, greg k-h 1) mutt drops you to your editor, and then you can just read in the patch file directly to that buffer.