All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, ktkhai@parallels.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, juri.lelli@gmail.com,
	pang.xunlei@linaro.org, oleg@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 10:11:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150603044157.GA1545@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150601140839.630055365@infradead.org>

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [2015-06-01 15:58:19]:

[...]

> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -213,9 +213,16 @@ static inline bool need_pull_dl_task(str
>  	return dl_task(prev);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void set_post_schedule(struct rq *rq)
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct callback_head, dl_balance_head);
> +
> +static void push_dl_tasks(struct rq *);
> +
> +static inline void queue_push_tasks(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> -	rq->post_schedule = has_pushable_dl_tasks(rq);
> +	if (!has_pushable_dl_tasks(rq))
> +		return;
> +
> +	queue_balance_callback(rq, &per_cpu(dl_balance_head, rq->cpu), push_dl_tasks);
>  }

When compiling with CONFIG_SMP=n, following build warning is triggered:
  CC      kernel/sched/deadline.o
kernel/sched/deadline.c: In function ‘pick_next_task_dl’:
kernel/sched/deadline.c:1136:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘queue_push_tasks’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  queue_push_tasks(rq);
  ^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

set_post_schedule() exist for CONFIG_SMP=n case, which was not modified to
queue_push_tasks().

[...]
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -624,9 +624,10 @@ struct rq {
>  	unsigned long cpu_capacity;
>  	unsigned long cpu_capacity_orig;
>  
> +	struct callback_head *balance_callback;
> +
>  	unsigned char idle_balance;
>  	/* For active balancing */
> -	int post_schedule;
>  	int active_balance;
>  	int push_cpu;
>  	struct cpu_stop_work active_balance_work;
> @@ -695,6 +696,21 @@ struct rq {
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> +static inline void
> +queue_balance_callback(struct rq *rq,
> +		       struct callback_head *head,
> +		       void (*func)(struct rq *rq))
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(head->next))
> +		return;
> +
> +	head->func = (void (*)(struct callback_head *))func;
> +	head->next = rq->balance_callback;
> +	rq->balance_callback = head;
> +}
> +

While compiling with CONFIG_SMP=n, another build error is seen:

In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:86:0:
kernel/sched/sched.h: In function ‘queue_balance_callback’:
kernel/sched/sched.h:710:17: error: ‘struct rq’ has no member named ‘balance_callback’
  head->next = rq->balance_callback;
                 ^
kernel/sched/sched.h:711:4: error: ‘struct rq’ has no member named ‘balance_callback’
  rq->balance_callback = head;
    ^

Guarding queue_balance_callback() with #ifdef CONFIG_SMP fixes
the issue, as all of the call sites are also with #ifdef  CONFIG_SMP

Thanks,
Kamalesh


  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-03  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-01 13:58 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: balance callbacks Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-03  4:41   ` Kamalesh Babulal [this message]
2015-06-03  7:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-03  8:24   ` pang.xunlei
2015-06-03  8:55     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-05  7:13       ` pang.xunlei
2015-06-05  7:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] sched: Use replace normalize_task() with __sched_setscheduler() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-02 13:58   ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-06-02 14:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-02 16:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-02 16:27         ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-06-03  7:32           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-03 10:40             ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-06-03 10:42             ` Kirill Tkhai
2015-06-03 10:45               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sched,rt: Convert switched_{from,to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task() Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 13:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] sched,dl: Convert switched_{from,to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-03  4:52   ` Kamalesh Babulal
2015-06-01 14:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: " Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-01 14:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-06-02  6:48   ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150603044157.GA1545@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pang.xunlei@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.