From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: netlink: Disable insertions/removals during rehash Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:52:27 +0800 Message-ID: <20150605035227.GA527@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20150514055824.GB6058@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150515.130257.1322224469755323983.davem@redhat.com> <20150516131628.GA981@gondor.apana.org.au> <20150516.171019.1206903516753105739.davem@davemloft.net> <20150604162727.GA2670@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , eric.dumazet@gmail.com, tgraf@suug.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Guenter Roeck Return-path: Received: from helcar.hengli.com.au ([209.40.204.226]:56180 "EHLO helcar.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751223AbbFEFVK (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2015 01:21:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150604162727.GA2670@roeck-us.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 09:27:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > sorry for bothering you - I don't see this patch in any of your trees, > and it is marked as "changes requested" in patchwork. Did I look > at the wrong places, do you still plan to apply the patch as-is, > or do you expect some changes ? I just looked up the patchwork entry and it actually says "not applicable" which is correct: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/473041/ Because the patch only applies to stable and is not needed in either net or net-next. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt