From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:27:10 -0700
Subject: Kernel contributions from organisations and individual privacy
In-Reply-To: <CAOGCNM4kULLt=SDaxUU_yd5hFeQcWcvhNKtH=ATrOz+H_3HEOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFOYHZC3dvi_UZfbd3t8ZGT21XDB4779eafgrZo6_EmrYrhG6g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOGCNM4kULLt=SDaxUU_yd5hFeQcWcvhNKtH=ATrOz+H_3HEOA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150611142710.GB17984@kroah.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 02:58:01PM +1000, Jason Ball wrote:
> I had a similar situation and managed to route patches via an intermediary to
> protect my employers anonymity at the time. ? You may (should) be able to find
> an appropriate sponsor depending on the nature of the customisations.

You can do that, but then the second party has to claim responsibility
for the code as well, legally and technically.  Both are usually not
cheap to pay for.

good luck,

greg k-h