On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 09:30:56PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > The core pcmcia code blows up all over the place if it allowed a card without > a valid CIS. We need to allow such cards as the CIS stuff is not on the older > flash, ROM and SRAM cards. We give it a suitably blank fake CIS instead. > > In order to minimise the risk of misidentifying junk and feeding it to the > wrong thing we only fix up apparently anonymous cards if the driver for them > has been enabled. Unfortunately, this patch does not work well with all of the callers of pccard_validate_cis(). While it helps for ds.c:pcmcia_card_add() and does not matter for cistpl.c:pccard_show_cis(), it breaks the callback in rsrc_nonstatic.c:readable(): There, we test whether iomem resources actually work -- and we test this by reading the CIS. This patch means that non-working resources are assumed to work -- and the valid CIS is replaced with the fake CIS in this case. Therefore, I'd suggest to move the override to the one place where it is needed -- to ds.c:pcmcia_card_add(). A patch which implements this is below; it fixes my test setup (which needs rsrc_nonstatic.c). Alan, could you verify this patch helps with the use case you had in mind when writing this patch? I inted to apply this patch to the PCMCIA tree only after such testing. Best, Dominik --------------------------------8<--------------------------------- pcmcia: do not break rsrc_nonstatic when handling anonymous cards Patch 1c6c9b1d9d25 caused a regression for rsrc_nonstatic: It relies on pccard_validate_cis() to determine whether an iomem resource can be used for PCMCIA cards. This override, however, lead invalid iomem resources to be accepted -- and lead to a fake CIS being used instead of the original CIS. To fix this issue, move the override for anonymous cards to the one place where it is needed -- when adding a PCMCIA device. CC: # for v4.0 and v4.1 Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c index 64d0515..d444415 100644 --- a/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/cistpl.c @@ -1451,26 +1451,16 @@ int pccard_validate_cis(struct pcmcia_socket *s, unsigned int *info) done: /* invalidate CIS cache on failure */ if (!dev_ok || !ident_ok || !count) { -#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_PCMCIA_ANONYMOUS) - /* Set up as an anonymous card. If we don't have anonymous - memory support then just error the card as there is no - point trying to second guess. - - Note: some cards have just a device entry, it may be - worth extending support to cover these in future */ - if (!dev_ok || !ident_ok) { - dev_info(&s->dev, "no CIS, assuming an anonymous memory card.\n"); - pcmcia_replace_cis(s, "\xFF", 1); - count = 1; - ret = 0; - } else -#endif - { - mutex_lock(&s->ops_mutex); - destroy_cis_cache(s); - mutex_unlock(&s->ops_mutex); + mutex_lock(&s->ops_mutex); + destroy_cis_cache(s); + mutex_unlock(&s->ops_mutex); + /* We differentiate between dev_ok, ident_ok and count + failures to allow for an override for anonymous cards + in ds.c */ + if (!dev_ok || !ident_ok) ret = -EIO; - } + else + ret = -EFAULT; } if (info) diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c b/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c index d3baf0b..e1498a0 100644 --- a/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/ds.c @@ -634,8 +634,24 @@ static int pcmcia_card_add(struct pcmcia_socket *s) ret = pccard_validate_cis(s, &no_chains); if (ret || !no_chains) { - dev_dbg(&s->dev, "invalid CIS or invalid resources\n"); - return -ENODEV; +#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_PCMCIA_ANONYMOUS) + /* Set up as an anonymous card. If we don't have anonymous + memory support then just error the card as there is no + point trying to second guess. + + Note: some cards have just a device entry, it may be + worth extending support to cover these in future */ + if (ret == -EIO) { + dev_info(&s->dev, "no CIS, assuming an anonymous memory card.\n"); + pcmcia_replace_cis(s, "\xFF", 1); + no_chains = 1; + ret = 0; + } else +#endif + { + dev_dbg(&s->dev, "invalid CIS or invalid resources\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } } if (!pccard_read_tuple(s, BIND_FN_ALL, CISTPL_LONGLINK_MFC, &mfc))