From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932491AbbFWKBH (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 06:01:07 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:38106 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932139AbbFWKBB (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 23 Jun 2015 06:01:01 -0400
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:00:54 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, oleg@redhat.com,
        paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, der.herr@hofr.at, dave@stgolabs.net,
        riel@redhat.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/13] percpu rwsem -v2
Message-ID: <20150623100054.GA18415@gmail.com>
References: <20150622121623.291363374@infradead.org>
 <55884FC2.6030607@bmw-carit.de>
 <20150622190553.GZ3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <5589285C.2010100@bmw-carit.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5589285C.2010100@bmw-carit.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> wrote:

> The machine has 0.5TB memory and doesn't seem to be really concerned about
> 'make -j200'
> 
> make clean && time make -j200
> 
> mainline 4.1.0
> 2nd run
> 	real    1m7.595s
> 	user    28m43.125s
> 	sys     3m48.189s
> 
> 
> tip v4.1-2756-ge3d06bd
> 2nd run
> 	real    1m6.871s
> 	user    28m50.803s
> 	sys     3m50.223s
> 3rd run
> 	real    1m6.974s
> 	user    28m52.093s
> 	sys     3m50.259s
> 
> 
> tip v4.1-2769-g6ce2591 (percpu-rwsem)
> 2nd run
> 	real    1m7.847s
> 	user    29m0.439s
> 	sys     3m51.181s
> 3rd run
> 	real    1m7.113s
> 	user    29m3.127s
> 	sys     3m51.516s
> 
> 
> 
> Compared to 'make -j64' on tip v4.1-2756-ge3d06bd
> 2nd run
> 	real    1m7.605s
> 	user    28m3.121s
> 	sys     3m52.541s

Btw., instead of just listing the raw runs, you can get an automatic average and 
stddev numbers with this:

  $ perf stat --null --repeat 5 --pre 'make clean' --post 'sync' make -j200

 Performance counter stats for 'make -j200' (3 runs):

       29.068162979 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.27% )

Thanks,

	Ingo