From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36963)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ehabkost@redhat.com>) id 1Z7UGB-0007Op-45
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:53:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ehabkost@redhat.com>) id 1Z7UG7-0007fp-Ve
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:53:31 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59680)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ehabkost@redhat.com>) id 1Z7UG7-0007fb-NU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:53:27 -0400
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:53:25 -0300
From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150623195325.GP3134@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
References: <20150623162555.GL30318@redhat.com>
	<20150623183115-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<20150623163858.GG3134@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
	<55898D09.2060405@suse.de>
	<20150623170859.GH3134@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
	<558994CE.9050001@suse.de>
	<20150623173917.GK3134@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
	<5589A70A.9050201@suse.de>
	<20150623192544.GO3134@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
	<5589B67F.5090409@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5589B67F.5090409@suse.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: "custom" CPU model +
 script to dump existing CPU models
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>, rth@twiddle.net

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:41:51PM +0200, Andreas F=E4rber wrote:
[...]
> I am going to stop arguing here and suggest you put this on the agenda
> for the next KVM call.

I am a bit confused. You said "I don't mind there being an optional
custom model" in a previous message.

If you have objections to libvirt API design decisions, I understand it,
but I suggest you take them to the libvir-list mailing list.

Now, if you have objections to having an optional custom model (i.e.
valid reasons to not apply patch 1/2), please let me know. I didn't see
a single argument to reject the patch, yet.

--=20
Eduardo