From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cfgfile: fix unitialised buffer Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:33:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20150629143352.GA11812@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1435307833-7432-1-git-send-email-danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com> <1435587625-5096-1-git-send-email-danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Daniel Mrzyglod Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4154A5A29 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:33:57 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1435587625-5096-1-git-send-email-danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:20:25PM +0200, Daniel Mrzyglod wrote: > Nature of the problem was not initialised buffer[256], there were probability > that operation system will provide previously used memory and on special condition > there were probability that string operations will work on random data that > could provide unexpected program behaviour. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod > --- > lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c b/lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c > index b81c273..9c85e9f 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c > +++ b/lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c > @@ -96,7 +96,10 @@ rte_cfgfile_load(const char *filename, int flags) > int lineno = 0; > struct rte_cfgfile *cfg = NULL; > > + memset(buffer, '\0', sizeof(buffer)); > + > FILE *f = fopen(filename, "r"); > + > if (f == NULL) > return NULL; > > -- > 2.1.0 > How about just adding "= {0}" to the end of the definition of buffer? /Bruce