From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from vader.hardeman.nu ([95.142.160.32]:49782 "EHLO hardeman.nu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750834AbbF2TFa (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:05:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:05:24 +0200 From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E4rdeman?= To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Antti =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sepp=E4l=E4?= , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] rc: rc-ir-raw: Add scancode encoder callback Message-ID: <20150629190524.GA29330@hardeman.nu> References: <20150521194034.GB19532@hardeman.nu> <5418c2397b8a8dab54bfbcfe9ed3df1d@hardeman.nu> <3b967113dc16d6edc8d8dd7df9be8b80@hardeman.nu> <20150618182305.577ba0df@recife.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:45:42PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote: >On 2015-06-18 23:23, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >>Em Sun, 14 Jun 2015 01:44:54 +0200 >>David Härdeman escreveu: >>>Mauro....wake up? I hope you're not planning to push the current code >>>upstream??? >> >>What's there are planned to be sent upstream. If you think that something >>is not mature enough to be applied, please send a patch reverting it, >>with "[PATCH FIXES]" in the subject, clearly explaining why it should be >>reverted for me to analyze. Having Antti/James acks on that would help. > >This thread should already provide you with all the information you need why >the patches should be reverted (including Antii saying the patches should be >reverted). > >The current code includes hilarious "features" like producing different >results depending on module load order and makes sure we'll be stuck with a >bad API. Sending them upstream will look quite foolish... And now the patches have been submitted and comitted upstream. What's your plan? Leave it like this? -- David Härdeman